Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

solved #12

Open
TooManyMatts opened this issue Sep 2, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

solved #12

TooManyMatts opened this issue Sep 2, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@TooManyMatts
Copy link

TooManyMatts commented Sep 2, 2022

solved.

@fradino
Copy link

fradino commented Sep 25, 2022

I have the same question with you, but I don't know why.

Hi,

thank you very much for your work and for releasing the code :) I wanted to reproduce the results of your SSAN-R method on the OCIM benchmark (Table 2 in your paper) and got the following results:

image

As you can see, results on protocols "O&C&I to M", and "O&M&I to C" are quite similar, but results on protocols "O&C&M to I" and "I&C&M to O" have AUC below 90 which is not that good. Do you have any ideas where would that gap in performance be coming from?

Perhaps the train-test split is slightly different. If that is the case, could you please share the train_list_video.txt and train_list_video.txt files?

Thanks again for your work, Matt.

@TooManyMatts TooManyMatts changed the title Reproducing results solved Nov 19, 2022
@alvarobasi
Copy link

alvarobasi commented Aug 8, 2023

Hi! I would be very grateful if you can explain how did you solved the issue. I'm having the same problem... Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants