You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Grid-animation was treated as a separate feature from Grid because it shipped later on, but at this point, we can consider this captured within the Grid feature all up (and all tests for grid-animation live under css-grid already).
I find it useful to know that grid-animation is not yet widely available, and think it's still important to communicate that different support story to users. We often use the group attribute to relate later additions like this, and grid and grid-animation are both are in the same grid group.
I am curious about your use case, though- are you doing some reporting around tests related to the feature ids?
There was a request to add feature metric tracking for all web features listed in this repo. However, Grid is already being tracked, and grid-animation can be considered tracked under Grid all up. This request is to simplify feature tracking by removing this category since grid-animation is captured within Grid and its test suite already.
We are 4 months away from grid animation becoming baseline high. When it does, it makes a lot of sense to merge the two features. Before this, I tend to agree with James.
Specification
N/A (this is request to remove)
Description
Grid-animation was treated as a separate feature from Grid because it shipped later on, but at this point, we can consider this captured within the Grid feature all up (and all tests for grid-animation live under css-grid already).
As such, I think we should remove the existing entry for grid-animation: https://webstatus.dev/features/grid-animation
Documentation
N/A (this is a request to remove)
Browser support
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: