-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Unify ./wpt check-stability
and ./wpt run --verify
#13406
Comments
This is more than just interface design. The semantics of the two commandsdiffer in a way that influences what passes for "stable". More on this here: |
@jugglinmike thanks for that summary! Beyond the AABB vs. ABAB ordering, you can from the Taskcluster logs that there are also differences in restarts. Example from #13405:
Anyway, it seems to me that |
No. |
Alright! @jugglinmike, how are things looking for making Taskcluster stability task failures blocking? |
Ping from your friendly neighbourhood ecosystem infra rotation If this is |
I'll downgrade the priority. Once we've gotten rid of stability jobs from Travis entirely we can do this. |
Previous issues and PRs (now closed/merged) on the topic of stability checking:
wpt run --verify
check-stability
script withwpt run --stability
and document how to run locally--stability
just use the--verify
codeHowever, with
--stability
gone, we're still left with two different things. On Travis we use./wpt check-stability
:wpt/tools/ci/ci_stability.sh
Line 12 in 654dc43
And on Taskcluster we use
./wpt run --verify
:wpt/.taskcluster.yml
Line 100 in 207fa91
It would be great with just a single approach that we can use everywhere.
@gsnedders @jgraham @jugglinmike
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: