contract method override types issues

[luu-alex]

We have an issue with the library with contract methods that are overriden, when there are multiple methods with the same name and different types, _createContractMethod will map the abi methods so that it will only use the first method type
issue is around here: https://github.com/web3/web3.js/blob/4.x/packages/web3-eth-contract/src/contract.ts#L1065
for example:

[
    ...,
    {
      inputs: [{ internalType: 'uint256', name: '_startTime', type: 'uint256' }],
      name: 'getPenaltyBP',
      outputs: [{ internalType: 'uint256', name: '', type: 'uint256' }],
      stateMutability: 'view',
      type: 'function',
    },
    {
      inputs: [{ internalType: 'address', name: '_user', type: 'address' }],
      name: 'getPenaltyBP',
      outputs: [{ internalType: 'uint256', name: '', type: 'uint256' }],
      stateMutability: 'view',
      type: 'function',
    },
]

calling contract.methods.getPenaltyBP("0xaceaEcB820Be3f147FF40d1C221B25F10ee8dd92").call().then(console.log) will result in the address converted into a uint and being encoded improperly

Expected behavior

contract.methods.getPenaltyBP("0xaceaEcB820Be3f147FF40d1C221B25F10ee8dd92").call().then(console.log) method should be encoded as an address

Actual behavior

Steps to reproduce the behavior

1. [First step]
2. [Second step]
3. [and so on...]

Logs

Environment

[sunidhiii]

You need to specify the signature of the method you're calling like this:
contract. methods.getPenaltyBP['getPenaltyBP(address)'] ("0xaceaEcB820Be3f147FF40d1C221B25F10ee8dd92").call()

[Muhammad-Altabba]

Hi @avkos ,
I think I fixed the source of issue at #6922 and now the developer can call using the following when there is ambiguity with the method overlading:

contract.methods['getPenaltyBP(address)'] ("0xaceaEcB820Be3f147FF40d1C221B25F10ee8dd92").call()

However, for the mentioned case where a value could be an address and still also be handled as a UInt or a string, I think it is not a good idea to handle as an address, because it could be also a string for example. And there are many cases like the ambiguity between uint8 and uint256 for example.
And because our library accepts a hex for uint as well as for string in addition to the possibility of being an address, I suggest to through an error in this case. But I think this might be a breaking chage. I referred to this at: https://github.com/web3/web3.js/pull/6922/files#r1536734512

Or what do you think?