Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Language tag handling #2

Closed
domenic opened this issue Apr 10, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed

Language tag handling #2

domenic opened this issue Apr 10, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
i18n-tracker Group bringing to attention of Internationalization, or tracked by i18n but not needing response.

Comments

@domenic
Copy link
Collaborator

domenic commented Apr 10, 2024

This issue is for discussing the questions noted in the explainer around language tag handling. As noted there, we're not quite sure what the right path is here. Investigating what other APIs do would be helpful.

One issue to worry about here which is more unique to the web is the impact on interop. For example, if a popular implementation supports the nuances of both en-US and en-GB, it might return both as supported. But then, some sites might start relying on this, and locking out browsers which only return en, or only return en-US. This could lead to unfortunate outcomes like browsers starting to lie and say that they support a large set of variants, when in actuality they use the same translation model for all such variants.

@domenic domenic added the i18n-tracker Group bringing to attention of Internationalization, or tracked by i18n but not needing response. label May 10, 2024
@aphillips
Copy link

I just now opened #11 which is effectively a duplicate of this, but resulting from our WG's review in w3c/i18n-request#231.

@domenic
Copy link
Collaborator Author

domenic commented Jul 26, 2024

Forward-duping to #11.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
i18n-tracker Group bringing to attention of Internationalization, or tracked by i18n but not needing response.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants
@aphillips @domenic and others