-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 358
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Surveying brand locations (using the Name Suggestion Index) #1693
Comments
But how would the question look like exactly? "Is this McDonalds part of the McDonalds brand?" does not really make sense. How to say that THE McDonalds is meant? |
🤔 Good question, perhaps then having the brand logo available would be necessary to be able to clearly show which brand is meant. |
This should take the two "netto" supermarkets in germany into account: Netto Marken-Discount and Netto. This needs the brand logo, too. |
This location is named "McDonald's", does it appear to be a "McDonald's" franchise or chain store? If StreetComplete can have links in that text, there could be a link to the wikidata entry (available in the Name Suggestion Index entry), and there could be multiple challenges with just franchises/chain stores/etc. |
This would probably run into similar issues as iD recently did where the logos were pulled from various external sources (including Facebook), opening up concerns about privacy. I don't know that you could have a database of logos on the device without taking up a lot of storage space, not to mention copyright concerns, and I also don't think downloading the logos for every quest is feasible for some people using mobile data. |
How is downloading an image from Facebook servers related to privacy?
Am 5. Januar 2020 04:21:03 MEZ schrieb pkoby <notifications@github.com>:
…This would probably run into similar issues as iD recently did where
the logos were pulled from various external sources (including
Facebook), opening up concerns about privacy. I don't know that you
could have a database of logos on the device without taking up a lot of
storage space, not to mention copyright concerns, and I also don't
think downloading the logos for every quest is feasible for some people
using mobile data.
|
Probably combination of tracking fears and FB=evil reaction. Both are justified but in this case what can be tracked is probably very limited (unlike Facebook pixel type of things). Still, tracking would not be relevant as in StreetComplete it would be bundled in the app, not fetched on demand. Question about bundling assets without an open licence still remains. |
In a web browser environment downloading results in sending a cookie to facebook. So facebook knows who you are and knows that your are editing an supermarket. |
Probably it won't be bundled in the app but downloaded when the quests are downloaded.
Why would a cookie be transmitted? So, it's not a simple HTTP request but an API with a login or something?
Am 5. Januar 2020 10:13:03 MEZ schrieb Holger Jeromin <notifications@github.com>:
…> How is downloading an image from Facebook servers related to privacy?
In a web browser environment downloading results in sending a cookie to
facebook. So facebook knows who you are and knows that your are editing
an supermarket.
But as @matkoniecz said: Not relevant when bundled in the app, if this
is allowed.
|
I would advocate for bundling the images in the app, if only because someone (me) might have a hosts file that blocks all requests to FB |
In a browser (id editor) there is no (easy?) way to prevent this.
On mobile? |
Yes, through a custom hosts file |
I am pretty sure that @westnordost was asking about situation in a potential SC quest, iD design issues are really offtopic here. |
If it's a simple HTTP/S get then the only thing FB will know is your IP, cookies are not required for grabbing images from there (yet I'd still prefer to avoid that) |
(This is a bit of a blue-sky quest though, because the effort to implement it is relatively high:
|
I had thought about this potential quest before, but I had and still have multiple concerns about it. They are mainly: Firstly, while namespaces, such as no: and no:, are documented in the wiki, they were neither subject to the proposal process, nor are they widely used. Secondly, there has been no discussion, which I am aware of, regarding the the name-suggestion-index and its bindingness. And since a user of StreetComplete should be allowed to be unaware of OpenStreetMap's tagging schemes only the most uncontroversial tags should be used. And while the OpenStreetMap wiki entry suggest to discuss changes prior to a pull request, there is no effective checking for that. Something that could lead to a controvery is that in the name suggestion index, one finds English Wikipedia article references for German brands only or mostly present in Germany. Thirdly, a store might match multiple chains/brands or not the correct/most specific one, even though the correct one is in the index. E.g. there is Aldi, Aldi Nord and Aldi Süd in the index. When the name matching from the index is used, a store named Aldi would match the Aldi entry, even though it is not the most specific entry, which should be preferred over the more generic one, making it less likely that someone would add the tags describing the chain. With a more advanced matcher, which would, on top of it, need to be developed from scratch, Aldi Nord stores with a tag for not brand Aldi Süd or alike could get into OpenStreetMap, which would it make even less likely that another one would try to add brand/chain specific tags. |
on topic of English Wikipedia article references for German brands only present in Germany Is German community expecting to use German-language wikipedia in such cases? If yes, please open issues (or pull requests) for this kind of problem at https://github.com/osmlab/name-suggestion-index (I fixed ones that I spotted in Poland). Feel free to ping me there (include @matkoniecz in issue/PR text to make more likely that I will notice and process it).
It is not binding at all. It may have mistakes and many were spotted fixed already. At this moment it is of a quite good quality, but as with any preset there will be always some issue lurking, especially as world changes and/or new entries get added. |
@matkoniecz Actually, I don't care, I avoid wikipedia tags at all cost and use wikidata for multiple reasons. I only know of one case, where someone didn't like the chosen language. And yes, the quality of the index is good. I just wanted to point out that it is a difference between something getting merged into a github repo for a preset or getting proposed and used tens of thousands of times – regardless of the quality or that I am not (yet?) aware of any serious problems with wikipedia links. The example was just to present the possibilities and to give an explanation for what I mean with being cautious. Since the usage of specific keys and tags for StreetComplete was cautious I thought also theoretical, still valid, concerns should be pointed out. |
I personally don't really care for wikipedia tagging since wikidata tagging provides the same information by proxy (and actually is more useful since wikipedia articles move around a bunch anyway). Such a quest could always leave the wikipedia tags out if they're contentious. |
Hi everyone, can I suggest to close this issue? I think this "quest" is not relevant for StreetComplete. It does not need a survey. If the building is named "Food Me", it's because someone tag it like that, so i can be confident on the fact that this shop is branded "Food Me Inc". If the shop is renammed "Shoes Me", so i will change the brand according to it and there is still no need of survey. The only think we need to do if to find any shops named "Food Me" and then add the tag "brand=Food Me Inc", "brand:wikidata=QXXXXXX", "brand:wikipedia=en:Food Me", ... For me, the best way to do so, is to use an Overpass query to find shops by name without tag brand, then you will edit the map to add brand tags. You can also use apps like MapRoulette, here is a challenge I made to add brand tags to a burger company: https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/12036 I really hope that it helps you. I really encourage you to try Overpass queries, you can look for any brand you want, then extract all data to JOSM and edit them manually. |
You can. I don't understand why you would though.
One reason to tag brand name and brand references to LOD projects, is to make sure those stores really are part of that brand. Especially important is this, if the brand names are somewhat generic like Burger King. (see way 165659335, if it hadn't
I don't recommend doing that for generic sounding brands.
You can use Overpass or another Query service at will, but editing brand tags without knowledge about the shop from survey or another usable source, like street-level imagery, is not a fully manual edit. |
Hi @camelCaseNick, and thank you. I think that i occulted a whole part of the issue here. I was only considering "generic brands". Sorry about that. |
I think there are also two other issues here @Binnette . Firstly brands which have gone away, although I think iD was looking to cover that, see for example: Secondly actually validating on the ground that the shop is still there, and of that brand etc (i.e. it hasn't closed or been replaced by something else). Otherwise I wonder if it's a bit of an automated edit: That seems like the main benefit of this quest to me, it allows things to effectively be re-surveyed. Also what about suggesting these names on the existing shop/amenity names, to avoid the inconsistency of |
Having just done a bunch of shops in a high street, using NSI's names as a suggestion when tagging shop names would also really help, e.g. type: |
And fuzzy-match |
General
Affected tag(s) to be modified/added: brand:wikidata, not:brand:wikidata (these are the main tags, amenity, leisure, cuisine, shop, etc. can all also be updated as driven by the Name Suggestion Index).
Question asked: Is this location part of the X brand?
Checklist
Checklist for quest suggestions (see guidelines):
not:brand:wikidata
is not currently widely used, however I would appeal to the fact thatnot:
is an established prefix and the iD editor already checks for this tagging to prevent false positive brand tag suggestionsbrand:wikidata
prevents future questsname
is correctnot:brand:wikidata
explicitly marks thisname
is not correct then updating the name prevents the quest reappearingIdeas for implementation
This quest type would be similar to brand tagging upgrades suggested by iD, so the behind the scenes implementation could really be along the same lines as done there.
I'm not too familiar with android development or Kotlin, but if you can use the javascript package directly then you could even use the provided matcher like iD does. Otherwise I suppose it would need to be re-written in a suitable language to see the same behaviour.
Element selection:
Elements tagged matching the categories present in the NSI (shop, leisure, amenity, etc.) Then check for fuzzy matches against the name tag (NSI provides
matchNames
for alternate possible names that could be the brand).Metadata needed:
I believe all metadata needed is available from the Name Suggestion Index (country codes specifying where a brand is present if it isn't global, alternate possible names and taggings, the tags that should be added to the brand). If anything needed can provided in a structure that's more convenient then that could probably be arranged too by opening up an issue to ask.
Proposed GUI:
A simple 3 possible answers question:
brand:wikidata
tagnot:brand:wikidata
tagnot:brand:wikidata
name
tagCould show the brand logo if available alongside the question, I know that google maps does this when asking users if POIs are a brand location.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: