Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

What should we put on LinkedIn for Education Team Leads #36

Open
tabithacherie opened this issue Sep 27, 2015 · 3 comments
Open

What should we put on LinkedIn for Education Team Leads #36

tabithacherie opened this issue Sep 27, 2015 · 3 comments

Comments

@tabithacherie
Copy link

What should we use for Linked In as Education Team Leads? What area should we enter information into, what skills/information should we use to describe what we do?

@kgibilterra
Copy link
Contributor

I vote add it as a job, and then mention at the bottom it is a volunteer position somewhere in the description. I added it like this! https://www.linkedin.com/in/kgibilterra

@emmagras and I did play with it for a while. I also have it as a volunteer organization...but I think I'm going to take that off.

If you have it as a job, you can use it when you connect to new people. So that solves the "how do you know X person?" problem. It doesn't solve it for our members (I would only expect members to be a part of the WWC group, not listing it directly to their experience) - but it's a start!

Which while we're at it, join the group! https://www.linkedin.com/grp/home?gid=7401503&goback=%2Enppvan_kgibilterra They don't have a lot of content, but maybe someday they will.

@nupurkapoor
Copy link
Contributor

Oh I like adding "Volunteer Position" at the end, I've always had it as a job, but mentioning volunteer makes sense. By the way @kgibilterra I stole your description. (oops)

@kgibilterra
Copy link
Contributor

👍 I know I've seen the beer emoji on github, but I'm not sure what it is now

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants