Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Define Alternate Steering Group Representative #235

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

zcorpan
Copy link
Member

@zcorpan zcorpan commented May 15, 2024

Fixes #223

@tantek tantek added the agenda On the agenda for the next SG meeting label May 20, 2024
@tantek tantek requested review from cwilso and annevk May 20, 2024 18:10
SG Agreement.md Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@annevk annevk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Chris, Tantek, and I discussed this in meeting. These are my notes based on that:

  1. We need to carefully check that everything related to decisions only counts SG Members.
  2. We discussed whether these should be like deputy editors or not and the feeling was that "alternate" is correct. I.e., they can stand in for an SG Representative but both are not present at the same time in a decision or meeting. The exceptions to this would be the communication channels such as the shared email address, Slack, and the GitHub team.

Chris and I will also check with our respective organizations to see if there's any further feedback.

README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
SG Agreement.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
SG Agreement.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@tantek tantek requested review from diekus and tantek June 18, 2024 16:57
Copy link
Member

@tantek tantek left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I believe this PR now answers all the questions in the comments and in the meetings.

Copy link
Contributor

@diekus diekus left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@tantek tantek requested a review from annevk June 18, 2024 19:45
@annevk
Copy link
Member

annevk commented Jun 19, 2024

Simon did not actually commit the proposed change to the PR. I'm guessing everyone agreed to the PR under the assumption that change is incorporated? It looks okay to me.

Co-authored-by: Simon Pieters <zcorpan@gmail.com>
Copy link
Member

@annevk annevk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks good, but we should make sure to get feedback on "Qualified Voting Party" in https://whatwg.org/sg-agreement#5-definitions first.

Comment on lines +49 to +52
[Alternate Steering Group Representative]. In the absence of the Steering Group Representative,
the Alternate Steering Group Representative may perform any of the actions that the Steering
Group Representative can perform as defined above. In the event that both take action, the actions
of the Steering Group Representative supersede.
Copy link
Member

@annevk annevk Oct 1, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Discussing this internally we're a bit concerned this still leaves room for confusion. How about something like:

The Steering Group representative and its corresponding Alternate Steering Group Representative cannot take action on the same subject simultaneously as this would get confusing as to whose voice counts. Only one can communicate on a given subject at any one time.

Other wording might be reasonable too, provided it addresses these two points:

  1. The initial sentence makes it seem as if you can delegate part of your responsibilities. That seems reasonable, but then "In the absence of the Steering Group Representative" isn't entirely accurate.
  2. We should not give the impression that it's appropriate for both to take action at the same time. For any particular discussion there should only be one Representative per Member involved. Though it is okay if this Representative changes over (longer stretches of) time, of course.

@tantek tantek self-assigned this Nov 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
agenda On the agenda for the next SG meeting
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

We should enable having alternate Steering Group representatives
5 participants