-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 318
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Allow user defined scanners. #248
Comments
Agreed that this would be nice. Ideally, the existing scanners would be refactored so that they behaved like third-party plug-ins rather than being baked into the source (they'd still be bundled, for convenience, but have them operate via the same API that any third-party plug-ins would need to use would be the way to keep the API "intellectually honest"). |
Sounds good. In fact if I start work on #249 I might do it in such a way that a custom scanner can be provided in addition to the |
Given the big rewrite for v6.0.x, I'm closing all older issues as there is unlikely to be anything significant happening on the Footnotes
|
It would be nice to be able to specify scanners without modifying command-t's source. For example a
locate
based scanner would be useful. Or someone might want to have agit ls-files -co
scanner rather then the default git scanner.Most commands output one file a line or files separated by null bytes. It would be nice to have a scanner (or one per split) that take a command to run and get results by splitting on nulls or newlines.
A nice benefit is that the
find
scanner can use it :)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: