Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Usability with proxifier #81

Open
idsks555 opened this issue Aug 27, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Usability with proxifier #81

idsks555 opened this issue Aug 27, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@idsks555
Copy link

idsks555 commented Aug 27, 2024

Proxifier supports 'Hostname' level proxification, means only mentioned [*.XYZ.com] will use VPN rather than the whole application. With Wireguard [Table=Off] this is achievable, but Wiresock disables conf saving ability whenever I use [Table...].
Though Wiresock has split tunnelling, but supporting [Table...] will definitely improve its integration with proxifier, and its the only reason I am still using Wireguard.

@idsks555 idsks555 changed the title Enhance usability with proxifier Usability with proxifier Aug 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant