Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[discussion] Adding Inkscape as an optional post Processing step #423

Open
tobiasfalk opened this issue Sep 24, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Comments

@tobiasfalk
Copy link

tobiasfalk commented Sep 24, 2024

I had the idea of an Inkscape post processor/svg to output renderer. I would make this optional so that if it is not able to finde inkscape or the user did not set the location of Inkscape, it would do exactly what it is currently doing.

I currently see two things that this would enable.

  • First, with my plan of implementing SVG drawing frame template support, it would then be able to export the drawing with a frame to multiple output formats.
  • Secondly, it would enable some more graphics hacking and maybe allow to implement [feature] Adding banded multicolor wires #109 and more.

Yes, I know with #369/#412, it already implements a kind of post processor, and this add an other step in creating the output, but I think it would give some more capabilities.

https://inkscape.org/doc/inkscape-man.html

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant