Opening multiple files from cli is treated as an argument

[Stoppedpuma]

Running oculante example-1.png example-2.png errors instead of opening just those two images. No idea if this should be treated as a bug report or as a feature request.

error: Found argument 'example-2.png' which wasn't expected, or isn't valid in this context

[woelper]

This is intended as you can't open more than one image at a time.

[Stoppedpuma]

I guess this should be treated as a feature request then, as you state this is "intentional" would you be open to implementing this type of behaviour?

[woelper]

I don't think that this would be high priority as a feature request. What would you expect to happen if you pass multiple files on the command line?

[Stoppedpuma]

For example, you have multiple files in a directory called example-x.png as well as other files which you don't want to open. This is where using oculante example* would come into place. Good use cases for this feature are of course are opening all files of a certain extension, opening certain images spanning multiple directories, and to match the expectation of how other cli tools work (e.g. running cat *.txt to display the contents of all txt files in a directory which also has md files).

[woelper]

And what exactly would happen after you open them? Do you mean they would be loaded into a sequence?

[Stoppedpuma]

Yes, the user should just be able to go through them with next and previous as if they are the only images loaded.

[Stoppedpuma]

0a2e918 makes #385 reproducible again.