-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Reproducing results on visual checkpoint #23
Comments
Specifying a fixed sample rate is not a good ideal! |
@guoxigan For sure - although I'm trying to replicate Table 7, which is with a fixed sample rate. I wanted to be able to test just the visual model to avoid training the full thing first. I have now got it working by implementing a testing script from scratch without using the util functions provided, although I'd be interested to know what the issue is with this version of the script |
Your script looks correct, and I suspect you might be using a very small sampling rate. The smaller the sampling rate, the larger the mean absolute error (MAE). |
As I said, I'm trying to reproduce Table 7, so I used the sampling rates there. Do you have your testing code available online anywhere @guoxigan? I'd be interested to see it, thanks! |
I'm sorry, but after I failed to reproduce Table 7, I deleted the previous project files. I suggest you first assume that the stride selection model can predict the optimal stride with 100% accuracy. In other words, use the following code to calculate the stride: “sample_rate = int(max((video.shape[0]/count+2)/32,1))” |
OK I'll have a play with it, thanks! |
Hi, I'm trying to reproduce the results in Table 7 of the paper - visual checkpoint only, manually specifying the sample rate, and I'm running into some issues. I have followed the suggestions in #13 and built a test script following the run_demo.py by looping over the files inside the test csv file, copying the exact process of run_demo.py but specifying a fixed sample rate. Currently my results are totally wrong (MAE 9.96). Do you have any suggestions for what I could be doing differently? Any help would really be appreciated!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: