fix(parser): code() dash parsing bug

due to the architecture of the inline code element parsing the code() function failed to parse inline code elements containing any special markdown character at the start of the element. This issue occured due to the fact, that i assumed a BACKTICK (`) always has the TEXT as a follow element which was in fact not correct and in retroperspective seems dumb. Whatever, its fixed now!

parser/parser.go

@@ -293,26 +293,12 @@ func (p *Parser) emphasis() Tag {
 	}
 }
 
-// TODO: possible issue: if no language or type is specified the parser assumes the next line to be the content
+// FIXED: inline code elements containing dashes (-) are not parsed correctly
+// BUG: if no language or type is specified the parser assumes the next line to be the content
 func (p *Parser) code(quoteContext bool) Tag {
 	p.advance()
-	if p.check(scanner.TEXT) {
-		// inline code:
-		b := strings.Builder{}
-		for !p.check(scanner.BACKTICK) && !p.check(scanner.NEWLINE) {
-			if p.check(scanner.TEXT) {
-				b.WriteString(p.peek().Value)
-			} else {
-				b.WriteRune(scanner.TOKEN_SYMBOL_MAP[p.peek().Kind])
-			}
-			p.advance()
-		}
-		// skip the `
-		p.advance()
-		return CodeInline{
-			text: b.String(),
-		}
-	} else if p.check(scanner.BACKTICK) {
+	scanner.PrintToken(p.peek())
+	if p.check(scanner.BACKTICK) {
 		// codeblock:
 		p.advance()
 		if !p.check(scanner.BACKTICK) {
@@ -355,8 +341,23 @@ func (p *Parser) code(quoteContext bool) Tag {
 			language: language,
 			text:     b.String(),
 		}
+	} else {
+		// inline code:
+		b := strings.Builder{}
+		for !p.check(scanner.BACKTICK) && !p.check(scanner.NEWLINE) {
+			if p.check(scanner.TEXT) {
+				b.WriteString(p.peek().Value)
+			} else {
+				b.WriteRune(scanner.TOKEN_SYMBOL_MAP[p.peek().Kind])
+			}
+			p.advance()
+		}
+		// skip the `
+		p.advance()
+		return CodeInline{
+			text: b.String(),
+		}
 	}
-	return Text{}
 }
 
 func (p *Parser) paragraph() Tag {