You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The request is not reaching Mono (no log output on the mono side), and nginx writes it's infamous HTTP ERROR 499 entry into it's log file: "POST /api/0.0.1/list.json? HTTP/1.1" 499 0 "-" "BestHTTP". This 499 entry is nginx-specific and only kept in the logs, not sent out to the client. The clients request times out.
The HFC log file doesn't have any output on that. We're calling it this way: usr/bin/mono /usr/lib/hyperfastcgi/4.0/HyperFastCgi.exe /config=/hyperfastcgi.conf /applications=/:/usr/aspnet/ /verbose /loglevels=All /logfile=/var/log/nginx/fastcgi.log.
We're using the most current revision of HFC and Mono 4.2.1.
After restarting HFC every request got served correctly and fast again.
On a sidenote - I had to kill -9 HFC, because a "normal kill" wouldn't work.
The question is - What can we do to investigate this issue further, other than debugging the code in an UI? (because we don't know what the root cause of this behaviour is to reproduce it). Are there any system information or logs which can help telling why HFC obviously stops responding?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It looks like the client closes connection before start to receive data. I'll look on this scenario at weekend, can this produce unexpected behaviour of HFC.
We encountered this issue already twice:
HTTP ERROR 499
entry into it's log file:"POST /api/0.0.1/list.json? HTTP/1.1" 499 0 "-" "BestHTTP"
. This499
entry is nginx-specific and only kept in the logs, not sent out to the client. The clients request times out.usr/bin/mono /usr/lib/hyperfastcgi/4.0/HyperFastCgi.exe /config=/hyperfastcgi.conf /applications=/:/usr/aspnet/ /verbose /loglevels=All /logfile=/var/log/nginx/fastcgi.log
.We're using the most current revision of HFC and Mono 4.2.1.
This is our HFC config:
That's all we got from the HFC log:
After restarting HFC every request got served correctly and fast again.
On a sidenote - I had to
kill -9
HFC, because a "normal kill" wouldn't work.The question is - What can we do to investigate this issue further, other than debugging the code in an UI? (because we don't know what the root cause of this behaviour is to reproduce it). Are there any system information or logs which can help telling why HFC obviously stops responding?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: