Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Legacy from 1.0: 3.10.1 Additional steps and enhancements: p:zip and p:unzip  #45

Closed
xml-project opened this issue Dec 31, 2016 · 3 comments

Comments

@xml-project
Copy link
Member

3.10.1 Additional steps and enhancements: p:zip and p:unzip 

This is an aggregation of the discussion on "3.10.1 Additional steps and enhancements: p:zip and p:unzip" (Issue 54 of the xproc/1.0-specification)

Opened by: ndw on 2014-08-22, 18:42h

ndw said on 2014-08-22, 18:42h:

The vocabulary of steps available in XProc is extensible. Users and implementors have developed additional steps. For example, to support pipelines that produce EPUB documents or manipulate files on disk. It is worth considering which, if any, new steps should be elevated to the XProc namespace. The candidates include, but are not limited to: 

p:zip and p:unzip 

On 2014-08-22, 18:42h: ndw added requirement should labels.

On 2014-08-25, 22:28h: ndw added this to the XProc 2.0 LC milestone.

On 2015-06-11, 13:01h: xquery added the steps label.
@gimsieke
Copy link
Contributor

gimsieke commented Apr 7, 2017

Also extend the current EXproc specs for pxp:zip and pxp:unzip with the ability to extract a whole archive to disk (plus an option whether existing files should be overwritten / the extract directory be removed beforehand) and to create an archive from a URI of a file or directory.

@gimsieke
Copy link
Contributor

gimsieke commented Sep 6, 2018

See xproc/3.0-steps#3 and xproc/3.0-steps#4 for generic archive/unarchive step requests

@ndw
Copy link
Contributor

ndw commented Sep 6, 2018

Closing 45, over taken by 3 and 4 above.

@ndw ndw closed this as completed Sep 6, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants