Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The implementation of taylor polynomials #2

Open
zeal-up opened this issue Nov 19, 2018 · 1 comment
Open

The implementation of taylor polynomials #2

zeal-up opened this issue Nov 19, 2018 · 1 comment

Comments

@zeal-up
Copy link

zeal-up commented Nov 19, 2018

It is weird that you implement the taylor polynomials mentioned in your paper in this way:

 w_x = tf.tile(_variable_on_cpu('weight_x', shape, initializer), [batch_size, num_point, K_knn, 1])
 w_y = tf.tile(_variable_on_cpu('weight_y', shape, initializer), [batch_size, num_point, K_knn, 1])
 w_z = tf.tile(_variable_on_cpu('weight_z', shape, initializer), [batch_size, num_point, K_knn, 1])
...
      g1 = w_x * X + w_y * Y + w_z * Z + w_xyz * X * Y * Z
      g2 = w_xy * X * Y + w_yz * Y * Z + w_xz * X * Z + biases
      g3 = w_xx * X * X + w_yy * Y * Y + w_zz * Z * Z
      g4 = w_xxy * X * X * Y + w_xyy * X * Y * Y + w_xxz * X * X * Z
      g5 = w_xzz * X * Z * Z + w_yyz * Y * Y * Z + w_yzz * Y * Z * Z
      g6 = w_xxx * X * X * X + w_yyy * Y * Y * Y + w_zzz * Z * Z * Z
      g_d = g1 + g2 + g3 + g4 + g5 + g6

I think it equal if you concatenate of [X, Y, Z, XX, YY, ...., XYZ] and multiply a [20xtaylor_channel] matrix (equal to a fully connected layer).
Do I miss something or understanding wrong?

@usherbob
Copy link

usherbob commented Dec 9, 2019

Equation 7 in the paper I believe is the same as the implementation in the code.
image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants