Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add step to re-evaluate actual BP #57

Open
yhoogstrate opened this issue May 5, 2017 · 0 comments
Open

Add step to re-evaluate actual BP #57

yhoogstrate opened this issue May 5, 2017 · 0 comments

Comments

@yhoogstrate
Copy link
Owner

yhoogstrate commented May 5, 2017

Do this based on the weight of the nodes, not the edges. Example (test-case 28):

image

Edge chr9:20682162(-)->chr9:20748649(-) has the largest weight with two reads, while the node at chr9:20682256 has a weight of 4 reads. This is also (most likely) the actual breakpoint.

Ideally the determined breakpoint should become chr9:20682256(-)->chr9:20748649(-)

(low priority, usually the more evidence the lower the chance this happens)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant