You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Please describe the feature you have in mind and explain what the current shortcomings are?
When rendering from maya host in Deadline and having set merge AOVs option leading to single image file containing all AOVs results into rendered image with <filename>_beauty.exr even tho there is no reason to append the _beauty suffix as it contains all RGBA data not just beauty component.
Currently there is now way to produce renders without _beauty suffix for multilayer EXR.
Here are staged files when rendering (all seems normal):
And when rendered and published (containing the "_beauty" suffix which cant be turned off)
How would you imagine the implementation of the feature?
When rendering into multilayer EXR containing all AOVs (merged) there should not be appended _beauty suffix at all. But only when multiple files being produced and such file might contain just the beauty component.
There should be Template naming used for such a task as now it is not ...being somewhat hardcoded as seen here
Are there any labels you wish to add?
I have added the relevant labels to the enhancement request.
Describe alternatives you've considered:
No response
Additional context:
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks. Feel free to re-open on ayon-maya if you find new issues.
resolved by using Publish Templates
If there were specific changes need in settings for this it may be good to mention the required changes here so we have it as a reference for the backlog.
Is there an existing issue for this?
Please describe the feature you have in mind and explain what the current shortcomings are?
When rendering from
maya
host in Deadline and having setmerge AOVs
option leading to single image file containing all AOVs results into rendered image with<filename>_beauty.exr
even tho there is no reason to append the_beauty
suffix as it contains all RGBA data not just beauty component.Currently there is now way to produce renders without
_beauty
suffix for multilayer EXR.Here are staged files when rendering (all seems normal):
And when rendered and published (containing the "_beauty" suffix which cant be turned off)
How would you imagine the implementation of the feature?
When rendering into multilayer EXR containing all AOVs (merged) there should not be appended
_beauty
suffix at all. But only when multiple files being produced and such file might contain just the beauty component.There should be
Template naming
used for such a task as now it is not ...being somewhat hardcoded as seen hereAre there any labels you wish to add?
Describe alternatives you've considered:
No response
Additional context:
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: