cron
is a Go library that allows adding cron-like scheduler(s) to Go apps, compatible with
Unix's cron time/date strings, to execute actions within the context of the app.
By itself, cron
is a fantastic tool released in the mid-70's, written in C, where the user defines a specification in
a crontab, a file listing jobs with a reference of a time/date specification and a (Unix) command to execute.
Within Go, it should provide the same set of features as the original binary, but served in a library as a (blocking / background) pluggable service. This means full compatibility with cron strings for scheduling, support for multiple executable types or functions, and support for multiple job scheduling (with different time/date specifications). Additionally, the library extends this functionality to support definition of seconds' frequency in cron-strings, context support, error returns, and full observability coverage (with added support for metrics, logs and traces decorators).
In a work environment, we see cron many times, in different scenarios. From cron installations in bare-metal Linux servers to one-shot containers configured in Kubernetes deployments. Some use-cases are very simple, others complex, but the point is that is a tool used for nearly 50 years at the time of writing.
But the original tool is a C binary that executes a Unix command. If we want to explore schedulers for Go applications (e.g. a script executed every # hours), this means that the app needs to be compiled as a binary, and then to configure a cron-job to execute the app in a command.
While this is fine, it raises the question -- what if I want to include it within the application? This should make a lot of sense to you if you're a fan of SQLite like me.
There were already two libraries with different implementations, in Go:
robfig/cron
with 12k GitHub starsgo-co-op/gocron
with 4.3k GitHub stars
Don't get me wrong -- there is nothing inherently wrong about these implementations; I went through them carefully both
for insight and to understand what could I explore differently. A very obvious change would be a more "modern"
approach including a newer Go version (as these required Go 1.12 and 1.16 respectively); which by itself includes
log/slog
and all the other observability-related decorators that also leverage context.Context
.
Another more obvious exploration path would be the parser logic, as I could use my generic lexer and generic parser in order to potentially improve it.
Lastly I could try to split the cron service's components to be more configurable even in future iterations, once I had decided on the general API for the library. There was enough ground to explore and to give it a go. :)
A personal project that I have for a Steam CLI app is currently using this cron library to regularly check for discounts in the Steam Store, for certain products on a certain frequency, as configured by the user.
Using cron
is as layered and modular as you want it to be. This chapter describes how to use the library effectively.
You're able to fetch cron
as a Go module by importing it in your project and running go mod tidy
:
package main
import (
"fmt"
"context"
"github.com/zalgonoise/x/cron"
"github.com/zalgonoise/x/cron/executor"
)
func main() {
fn := func(context.Context) error {
fmt.Println("done!")
return nil
}
c, err := cron.New(cron.WithJob("my-job", "* * * * *", executor.Runnable(fn)))
// ...
}
The runtime is the component that will control (like the name implies) how the module runs -- that is, controlling the
flow of job selection and execution. The runtime will allow cron to be executed as a goroutine, as its
Runtime.Run
method has no returns, and errors are channeled via its Runtime.Err
method (which returns an error channel). The actual runtime of the cron is still managed with a context.Context
that
is provided when calling Runtime.Run
-- which can impose a cancellation or timeout strategy.
Just like the simple example above, creating a cron runtime starts with the
cron.New
constructor function.
This function only has a variadic parameter for cfg.Option[cron.Config]
. This allows full modularity
on the way you build your cron runtime, to be as simple or as detailed as you want it to be -- provided that it complies
with the minimum requirements to create one; to supply either:
- a
selector.Selector
- or, a (set of)
executor.Runner
. This can be supplied asexecutor.Runnable
as well.
func New(options ...cfg.Option[Config]) (Runtime, error)
Below is a table with all the options available for creating a cron runtime:
Function | Input Parameters | Description |
---|---|---|
WithSelector |
sel selector.Selector |
Configures the Runtime with the input selector.Selector . |
WithJob |
id string , cronString string , runners ...executor.Runner |
Adds a new executor.Executor to the Runtime configuration from the input ID, cron string and set of executor.Runner . |
WithErrorBufferSize |
size int |
Defines the capacity of the error channel that the Runtime exposes in its Runtime.Err method. |
WithMetrics |
m cron.Metrics |
Decorates the Runtime with the input metrics registry. |
WithLogger |
logger *slog.Logger |
Decorates the Runtime with the input logger. |
WithLogHandler |
handler slog.Handler |
Decorates the Runtime with logging using the input log handler. |
WithTrace |
tracer trace.Tracer |
Decorates the Runtime with the input trace.Tracer. |
The simplest possible cron runtime could be the result of a call to cron.New
with a single
cron.WithJob
option. This creates all the components that a cron runtime needs with the most
minimal setup. It creates the underlying selector and executors.
Otherwise, the caller must use the WithSelector
option, and configure a
selector.Selector
manually when doing so. This results in more boilerplate to get the
runtime set up, but provides deeper control on how the cron should be composed. The next chapter covers what is a
selector.Selector
and how to create one.
This component is responsible for picking up the next job to execute, according to their schedule frequency. For this,
the Selector
is configured with a set of
executor.Executor
, which in turn will expose a
Next
method. With this information, the Selector
cycles
through its executor.Executor
and picks up the next task(s) to run.
While the Selector
calls the
executor.Executor
's Exec
method, the actual waiting is within the
executor.Executor
's logic.
You're able to create a Selector
through
its constructor function:
func New(options ...cfg.Option[Config]) (Selector, error)
Below is a table with all the options available for creating a cron job selector:
Function | Input Parameters | Description |
---|---|---|
WithExecutors |
executors ...executor.Executor |
Configures the Selector with the input executor.Executor (s). |
WithBlock |
Configures the Selector to block (wait) for the underlying executor.Executor (s) to complete the task. |
|
WithTimeout |
dur time.Duration |
Configures a (non-blocking) Selector to wait a certain duration before detaching of the executable task, before continuing to select the next one. |
WithMetrics |
m selector.Metrics |
Decorates the Selector with the input metrics registry. |
WithLogger |
logger *slog.Logger |
Decorates the Selector with the input logger. |
WithLogHandler |
handler slog.Handler |
Decorates the Selector with logging using the input log handler. |
WithTrace |
tracer trace.Tracer |
Decorates the Selector with the input trace.Tracer. |
There is a catch to the Selector
, which is the actual job's execution time. While the
Selector
cycles through its executor.Executor
list, it
will execute the task while waiting for it to return with or without an error. This may cause issues when a given
running task takes too long to complete when there are other, very frequent tasks. If there is a situation where the
long-running task overlaps the execution time for another scheduled job, that job's execution is potentially skipped --
as the next task would only be picked up and waited for once the long-running one exits.
For this reason, there are two implementations of Selector
:
- A blocking one, that waits for every job to run and return an error, accurately returning the correct outcome in its
Next
call. This implementation is great for fast and snappy jobs, or less frequent / non-overlapping schedules and executions. There is less resource overhead to it, and the error returns are fully accurate with the actual outcome. - A non-blocking one, that waits for a job to raise an error in a goroutine, with a set timeout (either set by the
caller or a default one). This implementation is great if the jobs are too frequent and / or the tasks too long, when it
risks skipping executions due to stuck long-running tasks. It relies more heavily on having configured Observability at
least on the
executor.Executor
level to underline those events (which get detached from theSelector
after timing out).
It is important to have a good idea of how your cron jobs will execute and how often, or simply ensure that there is at
least logging enabled for the configured executor.Executor
(s).
Like the name implies, the Executor
is the component that actually executes the job, on
its next scheduled time.
The Executor
is composed of a cron schedule and a (set of)
Runner
(s). Also, the Executor
stores an ID that is used
to identify this particular job.
Having these 3 components in mind, it's natural that the Executor
exposes three methods:
Exec
- runs the task when on its scheduled time.Next
- calls the underlyingschedule.Scheduler
Next method.ID
- returns the ID.
Considering that the Executor
holds a specific
schedule.Scheduler
, it is also responsible for managing any waiting time before the
job is executed. The strategy employed by the Executable
type is one that calculates the
duration until the next job, and sleeps until that time is reached (instead of, for example, calling the
schedule.Scheduler
Next method every second).
To create an Executor
, you can use the New
function
that serves as a constructor. Note that the minimum requirements to creating an Executor
are to include both a schedule.Scheduler
with the
WithScheduler
option (or a cron string, using the
WithSchedule
option),
and at least one Runner
with the WithRunners
option.
The Runner
itself is an interface with a single method
(Run
), that takes in a context.Context
and returns an error. If your implementation is
so simple that you have it as a function and don't need to create a type for this
Runner
, then you can use the Runnable
type instead,
which is a type alias to a function of the same signature, but implements Runner
by
calling itself as a function, in its Run
method.
Creating an Executor
is as easy as calling
its constructor function:
func New(id string, options ...cfg.Option[Config]) (Executor, error)
Below is a table with all the options available for creating a cron job executor:
Function | Input Parameters | Description |
---|---|---|
WithRunners |
runners ...Runner |
Configures the Executor with the input Runner (s). |
WithScheduler |
sched schedule.Scheduler |
Configures the Executor with the input schedule.Scheduler . |
WithSchedule |
cronString string |
Configures the Executor with a schedule.Scheduler using the input cron string. |
WithLocation |
loc *time.Location |
Configures the Executor with a schedule.Scheduler using the input time.Location . |
WithMetrics |
m executor.Metrics |
Decorates the Executor with the input metrics registry. |
WithLogger |
logger *slog.Logger |
Decorates the Executor with the input logger. |
WithLogHandler |
handler slog.Handler |
Decorates the Executor with logging using the input log handler. |
WithTrace |
tracer trace.Tracer |
Decorates the Executor with the input trace.Tracer. |
The Scheduler
is responsible for keeping schedule state (for example, derived from a
cron string), and calculating the next job's execution time, with the context of the input timestamp. As such, the
Scheduler
interface only exposes one method, Next
which is responsible of making such
calculations.
The default implementation of Scheduler
, CronSchedule
,
will be created from parsing a cron string, and is nothing but a data structure with a
cronlex.Schedule
bounded to a time.Location
.
While the CronSchedule
leverages different schedule elements with
cronlex.Resolver
interfaces, the Scheduler
uses
these values as a difference from the input timestamp, to create a new date with a
time.Date()
call. This call merely adds the difference until the next job to the
current time, on different elements of the timestamp, with added logic to calculate weekdays if set.
Fortunately, Go's time
package is super solid and allows date overflows, calculating them accordingly. This makes the
logic of the base implementation a total breeze, and simple enough to be pulled off as opposed to ticking every second,
checking for new jobs.
You're able to create a Scheduler
by calling
its constructor function, with the mandatory minimum of supplying a cron string through
its WithSchedule
option.
func New(options ...cfg.Option[Config]) (Scheduler, error)
Below is a table with all the options available for creating a cron job scheduler:
Function | Input Parameters | Description |
---|---|---|
WithSchedule |
cronString string |
Configures the Scheduler with the input cron string. |
WithLocation |
loc *time.Location |
Configures the Scheduler with the input time.Location . |
WithMetrics |
m executor.Metrics |
Decorates the Scheduler with the input metrics registry. |
WithLogger |
logger *slog.Logger |
Decorates the Scheduler with the input logger. |
WithLogHandler |
handler slog.Handler |
Decorates the Scheduler with logging using the input log handler. |
WithTrace |
tracer trace.Tracer |
Decorates the Scheduler with the input trace.Tracer. |
Schedule
is a data structure that holds a set of
Resolver
s, for each node, segment or unit of the schedule. This implementation
focuses on the cron string specification with added support for a seconds definition (instead of the usual minutes,
hours, days-of-the-month, months and weekdays). Each of these elements are
Resolver
s interfaces that will calculate the difference until the target value(s)
is reached. More information on Resolver
s in
its own section.
The Schedule
only holds the state of a parsed cron string, and its elements are
made public so that implementations of Scheduler
can leverage it to calculate the
job's next execution time.
To create a new Schedule
type, you're able to use the
Parse
function, that consumes the input cron string, returning a
Schedule
and an error if raised. More details on the actual parsing of the string
in its own section.
Once created, the elements of Schedule
are accessed directly, where the caller
can use the Resolver
interface:
type Schedule struct {
Sec Resolver
Min Resolver
Hour Resolver
DayMonth Resolver
Month Resolver
DayWeek Resolver
}
This component calculates the difference between the input value and the (set of) value(s) it is configured to be
triggered on, also given a certain maximum value for that Resolver
's range.
This difference is useful on a Scheduler
, where
time.Date()
sums the input time to the difference until the next execution. As such,
given each node in a Schedule
, it is possible to derive the next time per node,
following this logic.
Take a minute as an example. It is an element that spans from 0 to 59; and consider all elements start at zero. A
minutes Resolver
is configured with a maximum value of 59, and this example is
configured to trigger at minute 15. If the input time is 2:03 PM, the Resolver
returns a difference of 12. When the Scheduler
gets this information, it adds up the 12
minutes to the input time, and returns the resulting datetime value.
This also makes the Resolver
very flexible, in tandem with the corresponding
Schedule
and Scheduler
, providing customizable
levels of precision. The seconds Resolver
in
Schedule
is an example of this.
The implementations of Resolver
can be found in the
resolve
package. These are derived from parsing a cron string and assigned
automatically when calling the Parse
function.
To explore the different implementations, it's good to have in mind the modularity in cron schedules:
- it supports "every value" sequences when using a star (
*
) - it supports range value sequences when using a dash (
-
, e.g.0-15
) - it supports step value sequences when using a slash (
/
, e.g.*/3
) - it supports separated range value elements when using commas (
,
, e.g.0,20,25,30
) - it supports a combination of range values and steps (e.g.
0-15/3
) - it supports overrides, for certain configurations (e.g.
@weekly
)
Having this in mind, this could technically be achieved with a single Resolver
type (that you will find for step values), but to maximize performance and reduce complexity where it is not needed,
there are four types of Resolver
:
type Everytime struct{}
The Everytime Resolver
always returns zero, meaning that it resolves to the current time
always (trigger now type of action). This is the default Resolver
whenever a
star (*
) node is found, for example.
type FixedSchedule struct {
Max int
At int
}
The FixedSchedule Resolver
resolves at a specific value within the entire range.
It is especially useful when a node only contains a non-star (*
) alphanumeric value, such as the cron string
0 0 * * *
, which has both minutes and hours as FixedSchedule Resolver
s.
type RangeSchedule struct {
Max int
From int
To int
}
The RangeSchedule Resolver
resolves within a portion of the entire range. It is
used when a range is provided without any gaps. This means that the schedule element does not contain any slashes (/
)
or commas (,
), and is only a range with a dash (-
), such as the cron string 0-15 * * * *
, which contains a
RangeSchedule Resolver
for its minutes' node.
type StepSchedule struct {
Max int
Steps []int
}
The StepSchedule Resolver
is the most complex of all -- that could potentially
serve all the other implementations, however it can be the most resource-expensive of all
Resolver
s.
This implementation stores the defined values for the schedule and returns the difference of the closest value ahead of it. This involves scanning all the steps in the sequence as it requires looking into values that are less than the input, e.g., when the input is value 57, the maximum is 59, and the closest step is 0, with a difference of 3.
Doing this for complex cron setups can be more complex, and that is the major reason for having several other
implementations. Regardless, if your cron string is one that involves many individual steps separated by commas (,
),
or contains a given frequency delimited by a slash (/
), it surely will have an underlying
StepSchedule Resolver
to resolve that / those node(s).
The StepSchedule Resolver
is the only
Resolver
s which exposes a constructor, with the
NewStepSchedule
function, that takes from and to values,
a maximum, and a certain frequency (which should be 1 if no custom frequency is desired). Any further additions to
the Steps
in the StepSchedule Resolver
, should be added to the data structure,
separately:
func NewStepSchedule(from, to, maximum, frequency int) StepSchedule
In the Schedule Parser section, we explore how its processor will create the
Schedule
types following some rules, when working with the abstract syntax tree
from parsing the cron string.
To consume a cron string and make something meaningful of it, we must parse it. This step is most important to nail down accurately as it is the main source of user input within this library's logic. The executed jobs are of the caller's responsibility as they pass into it whatever they want. But having a correct understanding of the input schedule as well as calculating the times for the jobs' execution is fundamentally most important.
As mentioned before, this package exposes a Parse
function that consumes a cron
string returning a Schedule
and an error:
func Parse(cronString string) (s Schedule, err error)
This is a process broken down in three phases that can be explored individually, having into consideration that the lexer and parser components work in tandem:
- A lexer, that consumes individual bytes from the cron string, emitting meaningful tokens about what they represent. The tokens also hold the value (bytes) that represent them.
- A parser, which consumes the tokens as they are emitted from the lexer, and progressively builds an abstract syntax tree that is the cron schedule and its different nodes.
- A processor, which consumes the finalized abstract syntax tree created by the parser, validates its contents and
creates the appropriate
Schedule
.
The implementations of the underlying lexer and parser logic are taken from Go's standard library, from its
go/token
and text/template
packages. There is
also a fantastic talk from Rob Pike not only describing how to
write a lexer and parser as state machines in Go, but also carrying the viewer through the details of the
text/template
implementation. With this in mind, I had released the same general concept of a lexer and parser, but
supporting generic types, allowing consumers of the library to write their parsers for anything, with any type
(both for input, tokens and output). These implementations can be further explored below:
Taking this as a kick-off point, it's only required to implement 3 (major) functions for the lexer, parser and processor phases of this pipeline. These functions are broken down with their own individual handler functions, as required.
Introducing the Token
type, we can see how different symbols are set to trigger
different tokens, while having a few general ones like TokenAlphaNum
for numbers and
characters, TokenEOF
when the end of the string is reached, etc.
Starting with the lexer, it exposes a StateFunc
function. This is the starting
point for the state machine that consumes individual bytes. This function basically emits a token for a given character
(if supported), except for alphanumeric bytes (that are collected and a single token emitted with them), and at the end
of the string.
At the same time that the lexer is emitting these tokens, the parser's
ParseFunc
function is consuming them to build an abstract syntax tree. This tree
has a root (top-level) node that is branched for how many nodes are there in a cron string -- say, * * * * *
contains
5 nodes, * * * * * *
contains 6 nodes, and @weekly
contains 1 node.
If these nodes are more complex than a single value, then the node will store the value while aggregating all following
(chained) values by their symbol as children. These symbol nodes must contain a value as child (a comma cannot be left
by itself at the end of a node). Take the following node in a cron string: 0-15/3,20,25
. The node in the tree should
look like:
- (root)
+- alphanum --> value: 0
+- dash --> value: 15
+- slash --> value: 3
+- comma --> value: 20
+- comma --> value: 25
Having created the cron's abstract syntax tree we arrive to the last phase, the
ProcessFunc
function. It starts off by validating the contents in the abstract
syntax tree to ensure there are no unsupported values like greater than the maximum, etc.
Once ensured it is valid, the function checks how many nodes are children of the root node in the tree, with support for 3 types of lengths:
- 1 child node means this should be an exception (like
@weekly
). - 5 child nodes represent a classic cron string ranging from minutes to weekdays (e.g.
* * * * *
). - 6 child nodes represent an extended cron string supporting seconds to weekdays (e.g.
* * * * * *
).
Handling the exceptions is very simple as the function only switches on the supported values looking for a match. The switch statement is the fastest algorithm to perform this check.
A classic cron string with 5 nodes will still have a seconds Resolver
in its
Schedule
, by configuring it as a
FixedSchedule
type, triggering at value 0 with a maximum of 59 (for seconds).
Generally, the Resolver types for each node from both classic and extended cron strings are built by checking
if it's a star (*
) or alphanumeric node, creating the appropriate Resolver
.
Note that step values are sorted and compacted before being returned, for optimal efficiency when being used.
Lastly, considering the weekday support for 0 and 7 as Sundays, if the weekday
Resolver
is a
StepSchedule
type, it is normalized as a 0 value.
A working example is the Steam CLI app mentioned in the
Motivation section above. This application exposes some commands, one of them being
monitor
. This file provides some
insight on how the cron service is set up from a main.go
/ script-like approach.
You can also take a look at its
runner.go
file, that implements the
executor.Runner
interface.
This is not a one-size-fits-all solution! Please take your time to evaluate it for your own needs with due diligence. While having a library for this and a library for that is pretty nice, it could potentially be only overhead hindering the true potential of your app! Be sure to read the code that you are using to be a better judge if it is a good fit for your project. With that in mind, I hope you enjoy this library. Feel free to contribute by filing either an issue or a pull request.