Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
110 lines (71 loc) · 9.19 KB

README.md

File metadata and controls

110 lines (71 loc) · 9.19 KB

swissevote

CRAN Status

swissevote can parse cantonal voting register data, scrape authority websites for ballot data and provides other auxiliary functions around the Swiss e-voting trial data collected by the Centre for Democracy Studies Aarau (ZDA) at the University of Zurich, Switzerland.

Documentation

Netlify Status

The documentation of this package is found here.

Details

Raw data files

The cantonal raw data files are not included in this package due to legal restrictions and/or concerns regarding voter privacy and thus have to be provided by the user. The path to the folder holding these files must be set via the package configuration key path_raw_data (e.g. by setting the R option swissevote.path_raw_data) and the files under this path are expected to be organized and named in the following way:

[swissevote.path_raw_data]/
├──BE/
|  ├──BE_YYYY-MM-DD.EXT
|  └──...
├──GE/
|  ├──vYYYYNN.EXT
|  └──...
└──NE/
   ├──NE_YYYY-MM-DD.EXT
   └──...

The Genevan raw data files must be named according to the column filename in swissevote:::metadata_geneva_raw_datasets (which has been defined by the Geneva State Chancellery). Raw data files from the other cantons must be named by the canton abbreviation and the ballot date (e.g. NE_2019-02-10).

Caching

Time-consuming operations like reading in the raw datasets or scraping ballot dates from cantonal websites are cached to the local filesystem by default (using pkgpins). The maximum cache age for all affected functions can be set via the package configuration key global_max_cache_age 1 (defaults to 30 days if unset).

Installation

To install the latest development version of swissevote, run the following in R:

if (!("remotes" %in% rownames(installed.packages()))) {
  install.packages(pkgs = "remotes",
                   repos = "https://cloud.r-project.org/")
}

remotes::install_gitlab(repo = "zdaarau/rpkgs/swissevote")

Package configuration

Some of swissevote’s functionality is controlled via package-specific global configuration which can either be set via R options or environment variables (the former take precedence). This configuration includes:

::: table-wide

Description R option Environment variable Default value
Maximal timespan to preserve the package’s pkgpins cache. Cache entries older than this will be deleted upon package loading. swissevote.global_max_cache_age R_SWISSEVOTE_GLOBAL_MAX_CACHE_AGE "30 days"
the path to the directory holding the cantonal raw data files (which are not part of this package due to legal restrictions and/or concerns regarding voter privacy); see the section Raw data files in the package’s README for further details swissevote.path_raw_data R_SWISSEVOTE_PATH_RAW_DATA
:::

Development

R Markdown format

This package’s source code is written in the R Markdown file format to facilitate practices commonly referred to as literate programming. It allows the actual code to be freely mixed with explanatory and supplementary information in expressive Markdown format instead of having to rely on # comments only.

All the .gen.R suffixed R source code found under R/ is generated from the respective R Markdown counterparts under Rmd/ using pkgpurl::purl_rmd()2. Always make changes only to the .Rmd files – never the .R files – and then run pkgpurl::purl_rmd() to regenerate the R source files.

Coding style

This package borrows a lot of the Tidyverse design philosophies. The R code adheres to the principles specified in the Tidyverse Design Guide wherever possible and is formatted according to the Tidyverse Style Guide (TSG) with the following exceptions:

  • Line width is limited to 160 characters, double the limit proposed by the TSG (80 characters is ridiculously little given today’s high-resolution wide screen monitors).

    Furthermore, the preferred style for breaking long lines differs. Instead of wrapping directly after an expression’s opening bracket as suggested by the TSG, we prefer two fewer line breaks and indent subsequent lines within the expression by its opening bracket:

    # TSG proposes this
    do_something_very_complicated(
      something = "that",
      requires = many,
      arguments = "some of which may be long"
    )
    
    # we prefer this
    do_something_very_complicated(something = "that",
                                  requires = many,
                                  arguments = "some of which may be long")

    This results in less vertical and more horizontal spread of the code and better readability in pipes.

  • Usage of magrittr’s compound assignment pipe-operator %<>% is desirable3.

  • Usage of R’s right-hand assignment operator -> is not allowed4.

  • R source code is not split over several files as suggested by the TSG but instead is (as far as possible) kept in the single file Rmd/swissevote.Rmd which is well-structured thanks to its Markdown support.

As far as possible, these deviations from the TSG plus some additional restrictions are formally specified in pkgpurl::default_linters, which is (by default) used in pkgpurl::lint_rmd(), which in turn is the recommended way to lint this package.


Footnotes

  1. Its value must be a valid lubridate duration which can be a natural-language string like "2 days 1 minute 30 seconds" (or short 2d1min30s).

  2. The very idea to leverage the R Markdown format to author R packages was originally proposed by Yihui Xie. See his excellent blog post for his point of view on the advantages of literate programming techniques and some practical examples. Note that using pkgpurl::purl_rmd() is a less cumbersome alternative to the Makefile approach outlined by him.

  3. The TSG explicitly instructs to avoid this operator – presumably because it’s relatively unknown and therefore might be confused with the forward pipe operator %>% when skimming code only briefly. I don’t consider this to be an actual issue since there aren’t many sensible usage patterns of %>% at the beginning of a pipe sequence inside a function – I can only think of creating side effects and relying on R’s implicit return of the last evaluated expression. Therefore – and because I really like the %<>% operator – it’s usage is welcome.

  4. The TSG explicitly accepts -> for assignments at the end of a pipe sequence while Google’s R Style Guide considers this bad practice because it “makes it harder to see in code where an object is defined”. I second the latter.