Zed Preview 0.153.6 Remote Requiress GLIBC 2.35

[TTDRosen]

Check for existing issues

• Completed

Describe the bug / provide steps to reproduce it

When using the latest nightly zed on an ubuntu 20.04 system I see the following error reported by my local Zed instance.

failed to run command: .local/zed-remote-server-preview: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.35' not found (required by .local/zed-remote-server-preview)
.local/zed-remote-server-preview: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.32' not found (required by .local/zed-remote-server-preview)
.local/zed-remote-server-preview: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.33' not found (required by .local/zed-remote-server-preview)
.local/zed-remote-server-preview: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.34' not found (required by .local/zed-remote-server-preview)

On previous versions of nightly I was able to use the remote development feature without issue.

Environment

On remote system

~ > /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
GNU C Library (Ubuntu GLIBC 2.31-0ubuntu9.16) stable release version 2.31.
Copyright (C) 2020 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.
There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A
PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Compiled by GNU CC version 9.4.0.
libc ABIs: UNIQUE IFUNC ABSOLUTE
For bug reporting instructions, please see:
<https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glibc/+bugs>.

~ > uname -a
Linux yyz-lab-207 5.4.0-189-generic #209-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 7 14:05:13 UTC 2024 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

If applicable, add mockups / screenshots to help explain present your vision of the feature

No response

If applicable, attach your Zed.log file to this issue.

Zed.log

[SomeoneToIgnore]

See #17643 for more context: GitHub removed all Linux ARM runners with Ubuntu 20 and we cannot ship binaries with older libc that easy anymore.

Ubuntu 20.04 EOL is 23 April 2025n which is ~6 months so it makes not much sense for us to keep something more complex in CI for 6 months only.

[TTDRosen]

Thanks for the reply! This is an x86 based system, which I'm unfortunately going to be stuck using for the next 6 months 😅. But I imagine that note in the linked issue about the new 2.35 requirement is what's catching me here.

Any insight into if getting around this problem by building on a more up to date system and statically linking to musl would cause more trouble than it's worth?

[notpeter]

The note in the 0.152.3 changelog reflect the move Ubuntu 22.04 for the ARM runners was correct.

Separately this week we moved our Linux x86 runners to Ubuntu 22.04 in d3d3a09 which included some changes to our CI infrastructure as part of:

• Add an eval binary that evaluates our semantic index against CodeSearchNet #17375

This was unintentionally missing from the Release Notes in today's releases of Preview/Stable. I've updated the v0.153.6 v0.154.0-pre changelogs to include this change.