You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Mar 31, 2020. It is now read-only.
I've tried cifar-10 experiments several times and found that different learning rate and step have great influence on the final result, fluctuating about 0.1~0.2%. How can I address it? Hopefully someone give me suggestions!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Just to jump in the comments section. It seems that the learning rates were decide after empirical tests. My own finding are that the smaller the dataset, the higher the learning rate required so that the errors converge. @zhanghang1989 Would be able to comment better on this.
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
I've tried cifar-10 experiments several times and found that different learning rate and step have great influence on the final result, fluctuating about 0.1~0.2%. How can I address it? Hopefully someone give me suggestions!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: