Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

About the gt_bboxes_3d coordinates? Ego or Lidar? #13

Open
YTEP-ZHI opened this issue Aug 28, 2022 · 3 comments
Open

About the gt_bboxes_3d coordinates? Ego or Lidar? #13

YTEP-ZHI opened this issue Aug 28, 2022 · 3 comments

Comments

@YTEP-ZHI
Copy link

# convert 3DBoxes from LiDAR frame to Ego frame
lidar2ego_translation = info['lidar2ego_translation']
lidar2ego_rotation = info['lidar2ego_rotation']
lidar2ego_rotation = pyquaternion.Quaternion(
lidar2ego_rotation).rotation_matrix
gt_bboxes_3d.rotate(lidar2ego_rotation.T)
gt_bboxes_3d.translate(lidar2ego_translation)

I was wondering why you translate the coordinates systems of gt_bboxes from Lidar to Ego? Why not directly use Lidar coordinates?

@YTEP-ZHI
Copy link
Author

@zhangyp15 It seems that this transformation is not needed in other 3d detection projects like BEVFormer.

@zyrant
Copy link

zyrant commented Sep 20, 2022

I think it is perhaps a need for multi frames.

@alchemz
Copy link

alchemz commented Jan 12, 2023

@zyrant I think you are right, in the paper, the author mentioned ego-motion alignment performed after features extraction of multi frames.

@YTEP-ZHI Is lidar coordinate equivalent to world coordinate?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants