drm/i915: Clear breadcrumb node when cancelling signaling

When we call intel_engine_cancel_signaling() to stop reporting when
a request is completed via an asynchronous signal, we remove that request
from the breadcrumb wait queue. However, we may be concurrently
processing that request in the signaler itself, the actual operations on
the request's node itself are serialised but we do not actually clear the
waiter after removing it from the tree allowing both parties to attempt
to do so and corrupting the rbtree. (Previously removing from the
breadcrumb wait queue could only be done on behalf of i915_wait_request,
so this race could not happen).

Reported-by: "He, Bo" <bo.he@intel.com>
Fixes: 9eb143b ("drm/i915: Allow a request to be cancelled")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: "He, Bo" <bo.he@intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171115121458.24655-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
(cherry picked from commit c534612)
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c

@@ -517,6 +517,7 @@ static void __intel_engine_remove_wait(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
 
 	GEM_BUG_ON(RB_EMPTY_NODE(&wait->node));
 	rb_erase(&wait->node, &b->waiters);
+	RB_CLEAR_NODE(&wait->node);
 
 out:
 	GEM_BUG_ON(b->irq_wait == wait);