Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 16, 2025. It is now read-only.

revert(tls): Revert tls_built_in_root_certs option #105

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 9, 2024
Merged

Conversation

0x676e67
Copy link
Owner

@0x676e67 0x676e67 commented Aug 9, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced readability of the package description by removing code formatting.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Removed the tls_built_in_root_certs option from the ClientBuilder for both async and blocking clients, streamlining TLS configuration.
  • Tests

    • Removed the test_badssl_no_built_in_roots test function, reflecting updated testing strategy for TLS configurations.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 9, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes made involve simplifying the configuration options for TLS within the Rust HTTP/WebSocket client. Notably, the tls_built_in_root_certs option was removed from both the asynchronous and blocking client builders. This adjustment streamlines the API, enhancing clarity while maintaining core functionality. Additionally, the package description was refined for better readability, and some import statements were reorganized for improved structure.

Changes

File Change Summary
Cargo.toml Modified package description for improved readability by removing backticks around terms.
src/async_impl/client.rs and src/blocking/client.rs Removed tls_built_in_root_certs method from ClientBuilder, simplifying TLS configuration options.
src/tls/extension.rs Reorganized import statements for better readability; no functional changes.
tests/badssl.rs Removed test_badssl_no_built_in_roots function, eliminating a test for handling untrusted root certificates.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant ClientBuilder
    participant Config

    User->>ClientBuilder: Create a new client
    ClientBuilder->>Config: Set up configuration
    Config-->>ClientBuilder: Configuration ready
    User->>ClientBuilder: Build the client
    ClientBuilder->>User: Return configured client
Loading

Poem

Hop, hop, with joy I see,
Changes made so gracefully!
TLS settings now streamlined,
Simplicity, how sweetly defined!
A client swift, no roots to bind,
In code we dance, our bugs left behind! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between c8799b0 and 86ee279.

Files selected for processing (5)
  • Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
  • src/async_impl/client.rs (3 hunks)
  • src/blocking/client.rs (1 hunks)
  • src/tls/extension.rs (1 hunks)
  • tests/badssl.rs (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
  • Cargo.toml
  • src/tls/extension.rs
  • tests/badssl.rs
Additional comments not posted (2)
src/blocking/client.rs (1)

Line range hint 1-1:
Verify impact of tls_built_in_root_certs removal.

The method tls_built_in_root_certs was removed from ClientBuilder. Ensure that this removal does not cause issues in other parts of the codebase that might rely on this method.

Verification successful

No Impact from tls_built_in_root_certs Removal

The method tls_built_in_root_certs is not referenced elsewhere in the codebase, including comments and documentation. Its removal does not cause any issues.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the removal of `tls_built_in_root_certs` does not cause issues elsewhere in the codebase.

# Test: Search for any references to `tls_built_in_root_certs`. Expect: No references found.
rg --type rust 'tls_built_in_root_certs'

Length of output: 40


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for `tls_built_in_root_certs` in comments or documentation files.
rg 'tls_built_in_root_certs' --type md --type toml --type yaml --type json

# Search for `tls_built_in_root_certs` in Rust comments.
rg '//.*tls_built_in_root_certs' --type rust

# Search for any test files that might have referenced `tls_built_in_root_certs`.
rg 'tls_built_in_root_certs' --type rust --type test

Length of output: 203


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Re-run the search for `tls_built_in_root_certs` in Rust files, which may include test files.
rg 'tls_built_in_root_certs' --type rust

Length of output: 40

src/async_impl/client.rs (1)

Line range hint 1-1:
Verify impact of tls_built_in_root_certs removal.

The tls_built_in_root_certs field and associated method were removed from Config and ClientBuilder. Ensure that this removal does not cause issues in other parts of the codebase that might rely on this configuration.

@0x676e67 0x676e67 merged commit d0cda0b into main Aug 9, 2024
1 check passed
@0x676e67 0x676e67 deleted the revert branch August 9, 2024 01:30
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant