Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Feature/audit optimizations #336

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from
Closed

Feature/audit optimizations #336

wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

ignasirv
Copy link
Contributor

@ignasirv ignasirv commented Feb 9, 2024 •
edited
Loading

  • Set offsetutils at /32 divisions
  • divArith optimization
  • SHRaritInit + SHLarithInit optimizations
  • JMPZ optimizations
  • Other small optimizations

@cla-bot cla-bot bot added the cla-signed label Feb 9, 2024
@ignasirv ignasirv force-pushed the feature/audit-optimizations branch from 300baa9 to f8f9209 Compare February 9, 2024 10:02
@ignasirv ignasirv force-pushed the feature/audit-optimizations branch 4 times, most recently from dc970f5 to dfeb414 Compare February 9, 2024 17:11
@ignasirv ignasirv force-pushed the feature/audit-optimizations branch from dfeb414 to 9ae9dc4 Compare February 9, 2024 19:30
@sonarqubecloud SonarQubeCloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Feb 9, 2024

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

@ignasirv ignasirv marked this pull request as ready for review February 9, 2024 19:33
@krlosMata krlosMata mentioned this pull request Feb 13, 2024
Draft
@ignasirv
Copy link
Contributor Author

All the changes are already included at #339

@ignasirv ignasirv closed this Feb 29, 2024
@ignasirv ignasirv deleted the feature/audit-optimizations branch March 28, 2024 16:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@krlosMata krlosMata Awaiting requested review from krlosMata krlosMata is a code owner

@laisolizq laisolizq Awaiting requested review from laisolizq laisolizq is a code owner

@invocamanman invocamanman Awaiting requested review from invocamanman invocamanman is a code owner

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
cla-signed
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@ignasirv @krlosMata