Need to more gracefully describe agencies that aren't mapped to a specific county.

[LarryBafundo]

For agencies that don't belong to a specific county, like tribal lands and some state police, the overview describes where they are located a bit awkwardly, saying that the agency is located in "not specified county." For these "unmapped agencies" let's consider suppressing the county location and just saying they are located in the state.

cc: @RyanSibley, @AvivaOskow, @harrisj

[LarryBafundo]

[LarryBafundo]

this issue relates to the conversation here: https://waffle.io/18F/crime-data-explorer/cards/5931b8a3270a3900698d98d0

[harrisj]

See also https://github.com/18F/crime-data-api/issues/530 for backend implementation question

[amberwreed]

Consider calling "unspecified" something else re user testing. @RyanSibley

[LarryBafundo]

assigning this to you @RyanSibley temporarily just so that we can agree on what to call this new "unspecified" category. then we can do the engineering to consolidate the groupings in the list view.

[LarryBafundo]

let's avoid situations like this:

[LarryBafundo]

[RyanSibley]

Is it possible that we remove the grouping that contains the specified and unspecified categories? Is some of this a product of incomplete fields?

[RyanSibley]

I'm going to schedule a time to talk about this one

[RyanSibley]

I'm suggested we use no assigned county @harrisj @amberwreed @LarryBafundo

[jeremiak]

A wrinkle to this is that none of the agencies in DC have primary counties associated

[LarryBafundo]

"no assigned county" sounds good to me. with this new label this task is ready for implementation.