feat: The discriminator supports variables

[shaohuzhang1]

feat: The discriminator supports variables

[f2c-ci-robot]

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[f2c-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[shaohuzhang1]

The provided code snippet has a few areas that can be improved or cleaned up:

1. Exception Handling: The try-except block around the generate_prompt call is empty, which may not cover all potential exceptions. Consider adding more specific exception handling to manage errors.

2. Documentation Quality: The docstring for both methods (branch_assertion and assertion) could benefit from more detailed descriptions of what each method does, especially regarding the parameters field_list, compare, and their expected values.

3. Code Clarity and Readability: Ensure that the logic within the methods is clear and easy to understand. Adding comments explaining the purpose and functionality of sections of the code can enhance readability.

4. Performance Considerations: If repeated calls are made to workflow_manage.get_reference_field, consider caching results to minimize redundant computations.

Here's an updated version with suggested improvements:

from typing import List

class WorkflowManage:
    # Assuming this class exists and handles reference fields generation and retrieval
    pass

def branch_assertion(branch):
    """
    Determines whether all conditions in the given list evaluate to True when combined using logical AND.
    
    :param branch: A dictionary containing field lists and comparison operations
    :return: Boolean result based on the combination of conditions
    """
    condition_list = [
        getattr(self.workflow_manage, cond)(values)
        for values, cond in zip(batch[1:], batch[::2])
    ]
    return all(condition_list) if batch[0] == 'and' else any(condition_list)

def assertion(
    workflow_manage_instance,
    field_list: List[str],
    compare: str,
    value
):
    """
    Performs assertions based on field comparisons and optional prompt generation.
    
    :param workflow_manage_instance: An instance of WorkflowManage used to generate prompts
    :param field_list: List of strings representing the target field(s) involved in the assertion
    :param compare: String indicating the type of comparison ('>' (greater than), '<' (less than), '=', etc.)
    :param value: Value against which the fields will be compared
    """
    try:
        value = workflow_manage_instance.generate_prompt(value)
    except Exception as e:
        # Handle the exception appropriately, e.g., log it or raise a custom error message
        print(f"An error occurred during prompt generation: {e}")
        value = None  # You might want to set a default or skip further checks here

    field_value = workflow_manage_instance.get_reference_field(field_list[0], field_list[1:])
    
    # Add support handlers based on available functions
    for compare_handler in compare_support_handlers:
        if compare_handler.supports(field_list[0], field_list[1:], field_value, compare, value):
            return compare_handler.evaluate(field_value, value, compare)

Key Changes Made:

• Added try-except block in the assertion method for better error management.
• Enhanced documentation with more comprehensive explanations of method parameters and intentions.
• Removed unnecessary leading spaces to adhere to Python style conventions.