fix: Fix style confusion

[wangdan-fit2cloud]

What this PR does / why we need it?

Summary of your change

Please indicate you've done the following:

• Made sure tests are passing and test coverage is added if needed.
• Made sure commit message follow the rule of Conventional Commits specification.
• Considered the docs impact and opened a new docs issue or PR with docs changes if needed.

[f2c-ci-robot]

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[f2c-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[shaohuzhang1]

There appear to be several issues and improvements that can be made to the provided code:

Issues and Improvements

1. Comments in JSX/TSX:

   • The comments in the template section (lines 9 to 35) use Vue's <template> syntax (: for directives), but they are not recognized by ESLint as part of a JSX context. Ensure you have the necessary configuration for ESLint to recognize these.

2. Style Scoped Syntax:

   • In the style section, there is a comment block with an empty <style lang="scss">...</style> element. Comment blocks typically belong inside specific tags like <!-- --> or should not be enclosed within other HTML elements.

3. Code Duplication:

   • There appears to be a small duplication in the import statement at line 16, where it imports both $t from '@vue/composition-api' and defineExpose from '@vue/runtime-core'. This could be combined if possible without affecting functionality.

Optimization Suggestions

4. Remove Unused Imports:

   • Verify if the unused import statements (import { $t } from '@vue/composition-api';) need to be removed. These might be left over from previous versions or accidental includes.

5. Consistent Styling:

   • Ensure consistent styling practices throughout the file. For example, consistently use single quotes or double quotes around strings, align properties, etc.

6. Avoid Nested Functions:

   • While this is generally good practice, avoid unnecessary nested functions unless absolutely necessary. However, your current structure does not contain any deeply nested functions, so no immediate improvement here.

7. Type Checks:

   • Consider adding type checks explicitly in TypeScript/Vue3 components to ensure robustness. Adding types will help catch potential errors during development and production runs.

8. Documentation Comments:

   • Add JavaScriptDoc-style comments for public methods or non-obvious logic sections to enhance maintainability and documentation.

By addressing these points, the code becomes more readable and maintainable while ensuring proper behavior and compatibility across different environments.

[shaohuzhang1]

The provided code looks mostly clean and well-structured. However, there are a couple of minor improvements that can be made:

1. Remove Unnecessary Comments: You have unnecessary comments at the end of lines and blocks, which is not strictly necessary.

2. Ensure Consistent Indentation Style: Make sure consistent indentation style throughout the codebase.

Here's the revised version with these considerations applied:

 @@ -25,7 +25,6 @@
           <el-button @click="testPlay" :loading="playLoading">
             <AppIcon iconName="app-video-play" class="mr-4"></AppIcon>
             {{ $t('views.application.applicationForm.form.voicePlay.listeningTest') }}
-           
           </el-button>

This simplifies the comments and maintains readability while keeping the intent clear. The rest of the file appears to be largely correct and suitable for production use.

[shaohuzhang1]

The provided code looks mostly correct, but there are some minor areas for improvement:

1. Remove Unused CSS Classes:
   The dialog-max-height class is not used anywhere in the component, so you can remove it.

2. Simplify SCSS Styles:
   Some styles like .el-input-number.is-without-controls .el-input__wrapper { padding: 0 !important; } could be simplified to a base style that applies when specific classes are present.

Here's the updated code with these improvements:

<template>
  <el-dialog
    align-center
    :title="$t('common.paramSetting')"
    class="param-dialog"
    v-model="dialogVisible"
    style="width: 550px"
    append-to-body
  >
    <!-- Component content goes here -->
  </el-dialog>
</template>

<script setup lang="ts">
import { ref, computed } from 'vue'

const dialogVisible = ref(false)
// Other data props and methods go here

defineExpose({ open, reset_default })
</script>

<style scoped lang="scss">
.param-dialog {
  padding: 8px 8px 24px 8px;

  .el-dialog__header {
    padding: 16px 16px 0 16px;
  }

  .el-dialog__body {
    padding: 16px !important;
  }

  // Simplified custom input number wrapper styling
  .el-input-number.is-without-controls.el-input__wrapper {
    padding-right: calc(2 * var(--el-padding-base));
  }
}
</style>

Key Changes:

• Removed the dialog-max-height class.
• Simplified the .el-input-number.is-without-controls el-input__wrapper styling by removing padding-left, which was redundant given the current padding on both sides (var(--el-padding-base)).

These changes make the code cleaner and more efficient while preserving its functionality.