Skip to content

fix: Invalid verification of dialogue user form #2839

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 9, 2025

Conversation

shaohuzhang1
Copy link
Contributor

fix: Invalid verification of dialogue user form

Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Apr 9, 2025

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Apr 9, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@@ -268,7 +272,6 @@ const openChatId: () => Promise<string> = () => {
})
} else {
if (isWorkFlow(obj.type)) {
console.log(obj)
const submitObj = {
work_flow: obj.work_flow,
user_id: obj.user
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Here are your code changes and considerations:

  1. checkInputParam Method: This method was renamed to validate to better reflect its purpose of checking input validity instead of merely returning a boolean.

  2. Handling Validation Promises:

    • The existing validation logic now uses async/await syntax wrapped inside .then() blocks for handling asynchronous calls like handleDebounceClick.
    • In case there's an error during validation which results in calling showUserInput.value = true, the catch block is added to ensure that if any part fails, the loading indicator does not remain active incorrectly.
  3. Code Cleanups and Enhancements:

    • Removed unnecessary comments.
    • Adjusted spacing to improve readability.

Overall, these changes enhance the robustness and clarity of your code while maintaining functionality.

@shaohuzhang1 shaohuzhang1 merged commit 0861eb4 into main Apr 9, 2025
4 checks passed
@shaohuzhang1 shaohuzhang1 deleted the pr@main@fix_user_form branch April 9, 2025 10:11
})
.catch(() => {
emit('update:showUserInput', true)
})
}

function sendChatHandle(event?: any) {
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The code appears to be correctly formatted and has no known regularities. However, there are some potential improvements and optimizations that can be made:

  1. Improve Error Handling: In the autoSendMessage function, it is good practice to handle validation errors explicitly instead of simply returning. This makes it more robust and easier to understand.

  2. Error Message Feedback: When validation fails, emit an event to update the UI to indicate the presence of an error (e.g., input not filled).

  3. Optimize Empty State Logic: The logic for clearing the input fields after sending a message should be centralized so it's reusable and less likely to lead to mistakes.

Here's the revised version with these considerations:

function autoSendMessage() {
  props.validate().then((isValid) => {
    if (isValid === false) {
      // Handle validation failure, e.g., display an error message
      emit('update:showUserInput', true);
      return;
    }

    props.sendMessage(inputValue.value, {
      image_list: uploadImageList.value,
      document_list: uploadDocumentList.value,
      audio_list: uploadAudioList.value,
      video_list: uploadVideoList.value
    });

    inputValue.value = '';
    uploadImageList.value = [];
    uploadDocumentList.value = [];
    uploadAudioList.value = [];
    uploadVideoList.value = [];

    if (quickInputRef.value) {
      quickInputRef.value.textareaStyle.height = '45px';
    }
  }).catch(() => {
    emit('update:showUserInput', true);
  });
}

This revision improves error handling by checking the result of props.validate() and providing appropriate feedback using the emit method. It also centralizes the logic for resetting inputs in case of successful validation, making the code cleaner and potentially reducing bugs.

@@ -383,7 +380,7 @@ const renderDebugAiChat = (data: any) => {
dynamicsFormRef2.value?.render(apiInputFieldList.value, data)
}
}
defineExpose({ checkInputParam, render, renderDebugAiChat })
defineExpose({ validate, render, renderDebugAiChat })
onMounted(() => {
firstMounted.value = true
handleInputFieldList()
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  • Removed unused checkInputParam function. Its logic is now incorporated into the validate function.
  • Added Promise.all to handle multiple asynchronous validations (dynamicsFormRef.value.validate() and validate_query()) in the validate function.
  • Moved the validation error handling within the validate_query function to ensure consistent behavior across different validation functions.
  • Fixed typos in comments and variable names throughout the file.
  • Replaced non-standard template literals with standard one-liner templates for better readability.
  • Updated export statement to use defineExpose.

Overall, this refactoring simplifies the code structure and enhances maintainability.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant