Skip to content

fix: Lost historical conversation records #2954

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 22, 2025
Merged

Conversation

shaohuzhang1
Copy link
Contributor

fix: Lost historical conversation records

Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Apr 22, 2025

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Apr 22, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ const useUserStore = defineStore({
if (token) {
return token
}
const local_token = localStorage.getItem(`${token}-accessToken`)
const local_token = localStorage.getItem(`${this.userAccessToken}-accessToken`)
if (local_token) {
return local_token
}
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The code snippet provided has a few issues that need to be addressed:

  1. Incorrect Use of this: The line const local_token = localStorage.getItem(${this.userAccessToken}-accessToken) is using the keyword this, which refers to the current object in the context where it's used. If this is expected to refer to an instance property like userAccessToken, ensure that userAccessToken is properly defined and accessible within the correct scope.

    const userAccessToken = 'your-access-token-value'; // Example value, replace with actual logic
    
    const useUserStore = defineStore({
      state() {
        return {
          userAccessToken: userAccessToken // Ensure this is set up correctly
        };
      },
      getters: {},
      actions: {}
    });
  2. Accessing State Directly: The line return local_token; assumes that local_token contains JWT data. Make sure that you're handling this token appropriately, such as parsing it before returning it or converting it into JSON format depending on your requirements.

  3. Variable Name Consistency: You've changed one occurrence of ${token} to ${this.userAccessToken}, but remember to keep consistency across your application.

  4. Error Handling: It would be beneficial to add error handling around getting tokens from either storage to manage cases where no token is found or there is an issue retrieving the data.

Overall, ensure proper access and initialization of variables, handle edge cases, and maintain clean code practices for better readability and reliability.

@shaohuzhang1 shaohuzhang1 merged commit 0ec198f into main Apr 22, 2025
4 checks passed
@shaohuzhang1 shaohuzhang1 deleted the pr@main@fix_chat branch April 22, 2025 09:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant