Skip to content

fix: Fixed interface parameter transmission not displaying during deb… #2969

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 24, 2025

Conversation

wangdan-fit2cloud
Copy link
Contributor

…ugging

What this PR does / why we need it?

Summary of your change

Please indicate you've done the following:

  • Made sure tests are passing and test coverage is added if needed.
  • Made sure commit message follow the rule of Conventional Commits specification.
  • Considered the docs impact and opened a new docs issue or PR with docs changes if needed.

Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Apr 24, 2025

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Apr 24, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@wangdan-fit2cloud wangdan-fit2cloud merged commit b5b09dc into main Apr 24, 2025
4 checks passed
@wangdan-fit2cloud wangdan-fit2cloud deleted the pr@main/api-input branch April 24, 2025 03:24
.properties.user_input_field_list.length > 0 ||
(props.type === 'debug-ai-chat' &&
props.applicationDetails.work_flow?.nodes?.filter((v: any) => v.id === 'base-node')[0]
.properties.api_input_field_list.length > 0)
)
const showUserInputContent = computed(() => {
return ((isUserInput.value && firsUserInput.value) || showUserInput.value) && props.type !== 'log'
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There are no significant irregularities or major issues in this代码. However, here are a few points to consider:

  1. Type of v: The line inside .filter() is using type assertion (any), which can lead to runtime errors if not handled properly. It's better to specify the TypeScript types more explicitly.

  2. Complexity with Logical OR: The last part of the logical OR condition checks for different properties based on the application type (type). If these conditions become too complex and nested multiple times, they might make the logic harder to read.

  3. Variable Naming: Variables like firstUserInput should be defined before being used to avoid potential undefined variable usage errors during computation.

  4. **Computed Property Name`: While it seems fine at first glance, ensure that dynamic computed property names will work as expected across different environments, especially if you plan to use this in frameworks that support template interpolation or other reactive contexts heavily relying on computed properties.

Overall, the code looks functional, but improving its efficiency through better typing could enhance maintainability and prevent future bugs related to invalid data processing.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants