CI: Check symbol prefixes on Windows too. #1
Conversation
Reviewer's Guide by SourceryThis PR extends symbol prefix checking to Windows environments in the CI pipeline by removing Windows-specific exclusions and ensuring the check-symbol-prefixes.sh script runs in a shell environment across all platforms. Architecture diagram for CI pipeline changesgraph TD;
A[CI Pipeline] --> B[Check Symbol Prefixes];
B --> C{Platform Check};
C -->|Not iOS 1.61.0| D[Run check-symbol-prefixes.sh];
C -->|iOS 1.61.0| E[Skip Check];
D --> F[All Platforms including Windows];
File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
|
Seems you are using me but didn't get OPENAI_API_KEY seted in Variables/Secrets for this repo. you could follow readme for more information |
|
Thanks @2lambda123 for opening this PR! For COLLABORATOR only :
|
|
Unable to locate .performanceTestingBot config file |
![gitginie[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/712912?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@2lambda123
Thank you for your contribution to this repository! We appreciate your effort in opening pull request.
Happy coding!
|
Processing PR updates... |
Their most recently public accepted PR is: 2lambda123/obmarg-kazan#1 |
|
First PR by @2lambda123 PR Details of @2lambda123 in briansmith-ring :
|
PR summaryThis Pull Request updates the CI configuration to ensure that symbol prefix checks are performed on Windows platforms as well. Previously, these checks were not conducted on Windows, which could lead to inconsistencies or issues specific to Windows builds. By removing the condition that excluded Windows from these checks, the PR aims to enhance the robustness and reliability of the CI process across different operating systems. SuggestionConsider adding a note or comment in the CI configuration to explain why the symbol prefix check is now applicable to Windows. This could help future developers understand the rationale behind this change and maintain consistency in the CI process. Additionally, ensure that any potential Windows-specific issues that might arise from this change are documented and addressed. Disclaimer: This comment was entirely generated using AI. Be aware that the information provided may be incorrect. Current plan usage: 78.24% Have feedback or need help? |
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThe changes in the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
Description has been updated! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@2lambda123
Thank you for your contribution to this repository! We appreciate your effort in closing pull request.
Happy coding!
|
Failed to generate code suggestions for PR |
labels-and-badges
bot
added
NO JIRA
![korbit-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/322216?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I've completed my review and didn't find any issues.
Need a new review? Comment
/korbit-reviewon this PR and I'll review your latest changes.Korbit Guide: Usage and Customization
Interacting with Korbit
- You can manually ask Korbit to review your PR using the
/korbit-reviewcommand in a comment at the root of your PR.- You can ask Korbit to generate a new PR description using the
/korbit-generate-pr-descriptioncommand in any comment on your PR.- Too many Korbit comments? I can resolve all my comment threads if you use the
/korbit-resolvecommand in any comment on your PR.- Chat with Korbit on issues we post by tagging @korbit-ai in your reply.
- Help train Korbit to improve your reviews by giving a 👍 or 👎 on the comments Korbit posts.
Customizing Korbit
- Check out our docs on how you can make Korbit work best for you and your team.
- Customize Korbit for your organization through the Korbit Console.
Current Korbit Configuration
General Settings
Setting Value Review Schedule Automatic excluding drafts Max Issue Count 10 Automatic PR Descriptions ✅ Issue Categories
Category Enabled Naming ✅ Database Operations ✅ Documentation ✅ Logging ✅ Error Handling ✅ Systems and Environment ✅ Objects and Data Structures ✅ Tests ❌ Readability and Maintainability ✅ Asynchronous Processing ✅ Design Patterns ✅ Third-Party Libraries ✅ Performance ✅ Security ✅ Functionality ✅ Feedback and Support
![sourcery-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/48477?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey @2lambda123 - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:
Overall Comments:
- Please provide a description of your changes, particularly explaining why the Rust version check was changed from 1.63.0 to 1.61.0
- The PR title indicates enabling symbol prefix checks on Windows, but the description is empty. Please document the changes and any potential impacts
Here's what I looked at during the review
- 🟢 General issues: all looks good
- 🟢 Security: all looks good
- 🟢 Testing: all looks good
- 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
- 🟢 Documentation: all looks good
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
Micro-Learning Topic: External entity injection (Detected by phrase)Matched on "xxE"An XML External Entity attack is a type of attack against an application that parses XML input. This attack occurs when XML input containing a reference to an external entity is processed by a weakly configured XML parser. This attack may lead to the disclosure of confidential data, denial of service, server-side request forgery, port scanning from the perspective of the machine where the parser is located, and other system impacts. Try a challenge in Secure Code WarriorHelpful references
|
Description
The changes in this pull request modify the GitHub Actions workflow file
.github/workflows/ci.yml. The conditions for performing symbol renaming checks and installing LLVM tools have been adjusted to account for different target platforms and Rust channel versions.shfor executing the symbol prefix check script.These modifications help ensure that the symbol renaming checks and LLVM tools installation are executed correctly based on the specified criteria in the workflow.
Summary by CodeRabbit