Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add bdb deprecation FAQ #7

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 6, 2023
Merged

Add bdb deprecation FAQ #7

merged 2 commits into from
Nov 6, 2023

Conversation

progier389
Copy link
Contributor

@progier389 progier389 commented Oct 17, 2023

Add bdb deprecation FAQ

Reviewed by: @vashirov, @tbordaz, @droideck Thanks !

Copy link
Member

@vashirov vashirov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I added some suggestions for formatting and fixed few typos.

docs/389ds/FAQ/bdb-deprecation.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/389ds/FAQ/bdb-deprecation.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/389ds/FAQ/bdb-deprecation.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/389ds/FAQ/bdb-deprecation.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/389ds/FAQ/bdb-deprecation.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/389ds/FAQ/bdb-deprecation.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/389ds/FAQ/bdb-deprecation.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/389ds/FAQ/bdb-deprecation.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/389ds/FAQ/bdb-deprecation.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/389ds/FAQ/bdb-deprecation.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@tbordaz tbordaz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice document !!
Few comments

docs/389ds/FAQ/bdb-deprecation.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/389ds/FAQ/bdb-deprecation.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/389ds/FAQ/bdb-deprecation.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/389ds/FAQ/bdb-deprecation.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Mixing implementaions limitations are:

- The db_lib parameter is stored in the nsslapd-backend-implement attribute of cn=config entry, so it is global to the instance.
- backup / restore formats are tied to the db implementation so you cannot use a backup to restore an instance with a different implementation. (ldif export/import and initializing through the replication have not this limitation)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we mention impact on guardian and DB_VERSION ?

docs/389ds/FAQ/bdb-deprecation.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/389ds/FAQ/bdb-deprecation.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/389ds/FAQ/bdb-deprecation.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/389ds/FAQ/bdb-deprecation.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/389ds/FAQ/bdb-deprecation.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@progier389 progier389 force-pushed the nobdbfaq branch 3 times, most recently from a735a20 to b7e4993 Compare October 25, 2023 17:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants