-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add bdb deprecation FAQ #7
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I added some suggestions for formatting and fixed few typos.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice document !!
Few comments
docs/389ds/FAQ/bdb-deprecation.md
Outdated
Mixing implementaions limitations are: | ||
|
||
- The db_lib parameter is stored in the nsslapd-backend-implement attribute of cn=config entry, so it is global to the instance. | ||
- backup / restore formats are tied to the db implementation so you cannot use a backup to restore an instance with a different implementation. (ldif export/import and initializing through the replication have not this limitation) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should we mention impact on guardian and DB_VERSION ?
a735a20
to
b7e4993
Compare
Add bdb deprecation FAQ
Reviewed by: @vashirov, @tbordaz, @droideck Thanks !