Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

sortOrder defaults to 0 (None) if no existing regvalue is present #70

Closed
daviunic opened this issue Nov 2, 2019 · 1 comment
Closed
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@daviunic
Copy link
Contributor

daviunic commented Nov 2, 2019

It was meant to default to 1 (Ascending). Confirmed in 1.6.0, will be fixed in 1.6.1.

@daviunic daviunic added the bug Something isn't working label Nov 2, 2019
@daviunic daviunic self-assigned this Nov 2, 2019
@daviunic daviunic changed the title sortOrder default to 0 (None) if no existing regvalue is present sortOrder defaults to 0 (None) if no existing regvalue is present Nov 2, 2019
@daviunic
Copy link
Contributor Author

daviunic commented Nov 2, 2019

Fixed in 1.6.1.

@daviunic daviunic closed this as completed Nov 2, 2019
daviunic added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 2, 2019
Reworked the window message API for 86Box to fix status issues with confirmation dialogs
86Box instance is now focused when a confirmation dialog is triggered for shutdown or hard reset
ListView selection is now cleared when sorting only when more than one item is selected
Fixed issue #70
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant