Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Resolution keyword automatically added #171

Closed
uniomni opened this issue Oct 28, 2011 · 2 comments
Closed

Resolution keyword automatically added #171

uniomni opened this issue Oct 28, 2011 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@uniomni
Copy link
Member

uniomni commented Oct 28, 2011

Currently, the native resolution is stored in an extra keyword. This loosens the one-to-one relationship we had between keywords in geoserver and on file. It works but it is slightly annoying. Also the resolution value has to be a string so it needs to be converted back to float before using.

It would perhaps be better to leave the keyword as strictly user-defined and instead store the OWSLib metadata dictionary with
layer instances. Then all metadata would be available in any format. Not sure how important or doable this is, but now it has been flagged.

Associated with this issue, I can't decide whether to keep resolution as a 2-tuple (resx, resy) as gdal and geoserver uses or to go with a single cellsize which is what is actually stored in e.g. asc files and what is needed for scaling. Unfortunately, resx and resy are sometimes noticably different. This is now issue #173

uniomni added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 28, 2011
@ghost ghost assigned uniomni Nov 1, 2011
@uniomni
Copy link
Member Author

uniomni commented Nov 1, 2011

Mainly done on 28th October in changeset ec0d729#diff-0

@uniomni
Copy link
Member Author

uniomni commented Nov 1, 2011

Closing this for now with the option of reopening if we can store the native resolution differently one day....

@uniomni uniomni closed this as completed Nov 1, 2011
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant