ENH: Update coveralls version #592
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Didn't help, it's still counting docstrings. Doesn't happen on my mac with the same coverage version (7.4.4). |
|
Ah weird... is a docstring supposed to be a ' instead of " ? Maybe that will help. |
|
I think they are supposed to be double quotes - I might try exporting the coverage results to XML |
|
OK XML worked. It looks correct now |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Bumping the version, hoping to avoid coverage errors.
On coveralls.io, docstrings are being interpreted as uncovered code. This seems to only be a problem on multi-line function definitions.
https://coveralls.io/builds/66464549/source?filename=home%2Frunner%2F.local%2Flib%2Fpython3.10%2Fsite-packages%2Fants%2Fsegmentation%2Fatropos.py
I don't see this issue on my local machine if I run the tests