Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Greentea kvstorage tests Cypress targets fix. #12599

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 10, 2020

Conversation

tymoteuszblochmobica
Copy link
Contributor

Greentea kvstorage tests fixed to pass CY8CPROTO_062_4343W.

Summary of changes

Root of trust refactor caused side effect for CY8CPROTO_062_4343W.
CI didn't run on this target so issue wasn't disclosed.
This PR fixes it.

Impact of changes

No impact. this should fix Cypress target.

Migration actions required

Not needed

Documentation

Already merged
tymoteuszblochmobica/mbed-os-5-docs@ab7f37b


Pull request type

[x] Patch update (Bug fix / Target update / Docs update / Test update / Refactor)
[] Feature update (New feature / Functionality change / New API)
[] Major update (Breaking change E.g. Return code change / API behaviour change)

Test results

[] No Tests required for this change (E.g docs only update)
[x] Covered by existing mbed-os tests (Greentea or Unittest)
[] Tests / results supplied as part of this PR

Reviewers

@SeppoTakalo
@VeijoPesonen


@ciarmcom
Copy link
Member

ciarmcom commented Mar 9, 2020

@tymoteuszblochmobica, thank you for your changes.
@VeijoPesonen @SeppoTakalo @ARMmbed/mbed-os-storage @ARMmbed/mbed-os-maintainers please review.

@kyle-cypress
Copy link

Thanks for the fix. Confirmed with CY8CPROTO_063_BLE, CY8CKIT_062_WIFI_BT, and CY8CPROTO_062_4343W.

@mbed-ci
Copy link

mbed-ci commented Mar 10, 2020

Test run: SUCCESS

Summary: 5 of 5 test jobs passed
Build number : 1
Build artifacts

@mergify
Copy link

mergify bot commented Mar 10, 2020

This PR does not contain release version label after merging.

@mergify mergify bot added the release version missing When PR does not contain release version, bot should label it and we fix it afterwards label Mar 10, 2020
@adbridge adbridge removed the release version missing When PR does not contain release version, bot should label it and we fix it afterwards label Mar 10, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants