Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GreenTea: Fix inconsistency of Greentea KV message #13247

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 9, 2020

Conversation

jamesbeyond
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of changes

GreenTea: Fix inconsistency of Greentea KV message
linked with #13240

Impact of changes

Migration actions required

Documentation

not required


Pull request type

[x] Patch update (Bug fix / Target update / Docs update / Test update / Refactor)
[] Feature update (New feature / Functionality change / New API)
[] Major update (Breaking change E.g. Return code change / API behaviour change)

Test results

[] No Tests required for this change (E.g docs only update)
[] Covered by existing mbed-os tests (Greentea or Unittest)
[x] Tests / results supplied as part of this PR

Reviewers

@dustin-crossman

@mergify mergify bot added the needs: CI label Jul 8, 2020
@mbed-ci
Copy link

mbed-ci commented Jul 8, 2020

Test run: SUCCESS

Summary: 6 of 6 test jobs passed
Build number : 1
Build artifacts

@0xc0170 0xc0170 added needs: review release-type: patch Indentifies a PR as containing just a patch and removed ready for merge labels Jul 8, 2020
@0xc0170
Copy link
Contributor

0xc0170 commented Jul 8, 2020

@dustin-crossman Please review, this can be merged.

@dustin-crossman
Copy link
Contributor

Looks good to me. And I can confirm that the sleep and sleep_manager tests pass on our targets with these changes.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants