Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Restructure netsocket directory #13335

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Jul 27, 2020

Conversation

rajkan01
Copy link
Contributor

@rajkan01 rajkan01 commented Jul 22, 2020

Summary of changes

Dependent PR: ARMmbed/esp32-driver#4

Restructured features/netsocket as per the new directory structure proposal:

connectivity
├── netsocket 
│   ├── mbed_lib.json
│   ├── include
│   │   └── netsocket
│   │       └── *.h
│   ├── source
│   └── tests
│       ├── UNITTESTS
│       └── TESTS     // both netsocket & network tests

Impact of changes

None.

Migration actions required

None.

Documentation

To Be Updated.


Pull request type

[x] Patch update (Bug fix / Target update / Docs update / Test update / Refactor)
[] Feature update (New feature / Functionality change / New API)
[] Major update (Breaking change E.g. Return code change / API behaviour change)

Test results

[] No Tests required for this change (E.g docs only update)
[x] Covered by existing mbed-os tests (Greentea or Unittest)
[x] Tests / results supplied as part of this PR

Manual testing: (Build for K64F target with GCC_ARM toolchain)

  • mbed-os-example-sockets
  • Greentea tests: Full profile
  • Unit tests build and run

Reviewers

@0xc0170 @ARMmbed/mbed-os-core


@rajkan01 rajkan01 changed the title Netsocket dir restructure Restructure netsocket directory Jul 22, 2020
@ciarmcom ciarmcom added the release-type: patch Indentifies a PR as containing just a patch label Jul 22, 2020
@ciarmcom ciarmcom requested review from 0xc0170 and a team July 22, 2020 15:00
@ciarmcom
Copy link
Member

@rajkan01, thank you for your changes.
@0xc0170 @ARMmbed/mbed-os-connectivity @ARMmbed/mbed-os-wan @ARMmbed/mbed-os-ipcore @ARMmbed/mbed-os-maintainers please review.

Copy link
Contributor

@LDong-Arm LDong-Arm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM otherwise

@mergify
Copy link

mergify bot commented Jul 23, 2020

This PR cannot be merged due to conflicts. Please rebase to resolve them.

@mergify mergify bot added needs: CI and removed needs: work labels Jul 24, 2020
@rajkan01
Copy link
Contributor Author

@0xc0170 This PR is ready for CI. Could you start the CI, please

@0xc0170
Copy link
Contributor

0xc0170 commented Jul 24, 2020

CI started

@mergify mergify bot added needs: work and removed needs: CI labels Jul 24, 2020
@mbed-ci
Copy link

mbed-ci commented Jul 24, 2020

Test run: FAILED

Summary: 2 of 3 test jobs failed
Build number : 1
Build artifacts

Failed test jobs:

  • jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-GCC_ARM
  • jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-ARM

@jamesbeyond
Copy link
Contributor

Hi, @rajkan01 @paul-szczepanek-arm
cc @0xc0170

as I mentioned, in slack, earlier. this PR is dependent on ARMmbed/esp32-driver#4
I believe if ARMmbed/esp32-driver#4 merged, and this one not merged yet, it will cause failure in CI,
So please merged those 2 one after another quickly , and shorten the CI down time.

@rajkan01
Copy link
Contributor Author

@0xc0170 Please restart the CI for this PR as ARMmbed/esp32-driver#4 merged already that will break CI without this PR

@0xc0170
Copy link
Contributor

0xc0170 commented Jul 27, 2020

CI restarted

@mbed-ci
Copy link

mbed-ci commented Jul 27, 2020

Test run: SUCCESS

Summary: 6 of 6 test jobs passed
Build number : 2
Build artifacts

@rajkan01
Copy link
Contributor Author

@0xc0170 This PR CI passed, could you merge

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants