Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

A better way to find and save mbed hid devices #36

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 16, 2013

Conversation

TerryGuo
Copy link

Previously we remove non-mbed devices from result array while iterating it. The logic is correct, but the iteration and removal can't happen to an array simultaneously in Python. This new approach finds mbed devices and save them into a new array.

Please help to review and let me know anything that needs further changes. Thanks.

emilmont added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 16, 2013
A better way to find and save mbed hid devices
@emilmont emilmont merged commit 3b0618e into ARMmbed:master Aug 16, 2013
bridadan pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 21, 2016
SeppoTakalo pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 9, 2016
This fixes unstability issues. Still need to refactor
coap_security_handler_read()-function to work as specified in mbedTLS
documentation. This commit should be treated as a temporary fix.
yossi2le pushed a commit to yossi2le/mbed-os that referenced this pull request Jan 2, 2019
geky pushed a commit to geky/mbed that referenced this pull request Jan 17, 2019
Added a short section about the callback functions, based on the answers
to issue ARMmbed#35 and ARMmbed#36
linlingao pushed a commit to linlingao/mbed-os that referenced this pull request Jul 12, 2019
pan- pushed a commit to pan-/mbed that referenced this pull request May 29, 2020
Cleanup code to pass by reference and not pointer
pan- added a commit to pan-/mbed that referenced this pull request May 29, 2020
…ructions

Update instructions of the regarding the BLE Eddystone service.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants