Add Nuvoton m2351device #4892

deepikabhavnani · 2017-08-11T17:07:31Z

Rebased code from nuvoton_m2351_testchip_ref branch.

Status : In Development
Working on secure / non-secure separate binaries and way to access secure section from non-secure code.
Dependent on PR #5094

Rebase might be required after preceding PR's are merged.

theotherjimmy · 2017-08-17T15:11:50Z

Rebase time!

theotherjimmy · 2017-08-29T18:21:42Z

@deepikabhavnani This is in need of another rebase.

0xc0170 · 2017-08-31T09:59:42Z

Travis still is red AssertionError: Target NUMAKER_PFM_M2351 contains invalid device_name M2351K1AAEES . However got like 3 dependencies, I believe this will get an update once those are merged

deepikabhavnani · 2017-09-12T15:04:41Z

Failure is CI is expected, as device patch is not yet added to IAR/uVision software

theotherjimmy · 2017-09-12T15:53:17Z

so then remove the device_has key.

deepikabhavnani · 2017-09-13T20:41:21Z

Rebased and added support for ARMC6 compiler.

Build for ARM fails with develop/release profile with ARMC6 compiler issue. Build works only for debug profile (optimization -o0)

deepikabhavnani · 2017-09-14T16:06:31Z

ARMC6 compiler support for Cortex device is moved to new PR #5094

theotherjimmy · 2017-09-14T16:09:48Z

@deepikabhavnani Did you mean specifically cortex-M23/33? I think all the devices are cortex.

deepikabhavnani · 2017-09-14T16:15:45Z

@theotherjimmy - Specific to Cortex-M23. Added that comment, because i will remove generic code from last commit (060fe56) which is for all cortex-m23 devices

…issue

…r files

… linker file

It was named and used as if it were positive logic, and written with negative logic. This changes the name and usage to negative logic.

deepikabhavnani · 2017-10-17T17:01:38Z

Commits for ARMC6 export are to verify ARMC6 and should be removed after branch from @theotherjimmy ( https://github.com/theotherjimmy/mbed/commits/uvision-armc6) is merged.
List of commits - 67499b2 15e8d94 bed8a0b ea6212a 7005a67

theotherjimmy · 2017-10-17T19:07:01Z

I take it that you want me to push those commits up as a separate PR then!

Serial init function is common for secure/non-secure serial devices, hence only the required secure function (CLK) should be set as secure. Gpio_dir() not required to be secure function since all GPIO ports are non-secure

adbridge · 2017-10-31T14:45:20Z

@deepikabhavnani looks like this now needs a rebase..

deepikabhavnani · 2017-10-31T15:00:50Z

@theotherjimmy @adbridge @0xc0170 - This PR is on hold till ARMC6 compiler issue is not resolved.
https://jira.arm.com/browse/SDCOMP-49132

deepikabhavnani · 2017-11-22T14:46:41Z

Closing this, will reopen when work on this feature is resumed

deepikabhavnani mentioned this pull request Aug 11, 2017

Initial support for Cortex M-23/M-33 devices. #4875

Merged

deepikabhavnani added the needs: work label Aug 11, 2017

theotherjimmy added scope: new-target needs: preceding PR and removed needs: preceding PR labels Aug 14, 2017

deepikabhavnani force-pushed the nuvoton_m2351_rebase branch from 0b53740 to a09a9c8 Compare August 17, 2017 16:02

deepikabhavnani added the needs: preceding PR label Aug 17, 2017

deepikabhavnani force-pushed the nuvoton_m2351_rebase branch 2 times, most recently from 0a39fa7 to adb8ba4 Compare August 18, 2017 20:03

deepikabhavnani added needs: review and removed needs: work labels Aug 18, 2017

deepikabhavnani force-pushed the nuvoton_m2351_rebase branch from adb8ba4 to 490addf Compare August 29, 2017 19:34

deepikabhavnani force-pushed the nuvoton_m2351_rebase branch from 490addf to e044d5b Compare September 11, 2017 17:58

deepikabhavnani force-pushed the nuvoton_m2351_rebase branch from b1cdd7d to 778e7c7 Compare September 12, 2017 20:27

deepikabhavnani added devices: nuvoton needs: work and removed needs: review labels Sep 12, 2017

deepikabhavnani requested a review from cyliangtw September 12, 2017 21:58

deepikabhavnani force-pushed the nuvoton_m2351_rebase branch from 5827612 to 060fe56 Compare September 13, 2017 20:38

deepikabhavnani force-pushed the nuvoton_m2351_rebase branch 2 times, most recently from 1dc6bc7 to 6eee56e Compare September 14, 2017 19:18

cyliangtw and others added 7 commits October 13, 2017 13:58

[M2351] IAR linker file support both of secure & non-secure domain

255ca5c

[M2351] Fix GCC linker file 'cannot move location counter backwards' …

862b943

…issue

[M2351] Corrected preprocess define usage in toolchain specific linke…

2b5dea6

…r files

[M2351] Support secure loader invoke non-secure Mbed OS

460f80c

[M2351] Link register base with partition file & correct heap size in…

db25e2d

… linker file

[M2351] Corrected Vector table address in scatter file

ce23676

[M2351] Add non-secure reset handler address

508037e

deepikabhavnani force-pushed the nuvoton_m2351_rebase branch 3 times, most recently from 8e13f1d to 508037e Compare October 16, 2017 15:18

Deepika and others added 7 commits October 16, 2017 16:46

Updating trustzone functions for IAR

1ed15f8

Port dir not required to be secure

c3822e0

Temp change for debugging

9162f40

Enable export to uvision5 + armc6

67499b2

Correct check for in-template flags

15e8d94

It was named and used as if it were positive logic, and written with negative logic. This changes the name and usage to negative logic.

Use relative path to detect config header and remove -std options

bed8a0b

Remove -MMD and debug print

ea6212a

Enable uvision export for NS cores

7005a67

[M2351] Updating secure/non-secure functions

83cd048

Serial init function is common for secure/non-secure serial devices, hence only the required secure function (CLK) should be set as secure. Gpio_dir() not required to be secure function since all GPIO ports are non-secure

theotherjimmy added the needs: preceding PR label Oct 23, 2017

adbridge added needs: work and removed needs: review labels Oct 31, 2017

theotherjimmy removed the needs: preceding PR label Nov 13, 2017

deepikabhavnani closed this Nov 22, 2017

sg- removed the needs: work label Nov 22, 2017

Add Nuvoton m2351device #4892

Add Nuvoton m2351device #4892

Uh oh!

Conversation

deepikabhavnani commented Aug 11, 2017 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

theotherjimmy commented Aug 17, 2017

Uh oh!

theotherjimmy commented Aug 29, 2017

Uh oh!

0xc0170 commented Aug 31, 2017

Uh oh!

deepikabhavnani commented Sep 12, 2017

Uh oh!

theotherjimmy commented Sep 12, 2017

Uh oh!

deepikabhavnani commented Sep 13, 2017

Uh oh!

deepikabhavnani commented Sep 14, 2017

Uh oh!

theotherjimmy commented Sep 14, 2017

Uh oh!

deepikabhavnani commented Sep 14, 2017 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

deepikabhavnani commented Oct 17, 2017 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

theotherjimmy commented Oct 17, 2017

Uh oh!

adbridge commented Oct 31, 2017

Uh oh!

deepikabhavnani commented Oct 31, 2017

Uh oh!

deepikabhavnani commented Nov 22, 2017

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

6 participants

deepikabhavnani commented Aug 11, 2017 •

edited

Loading

deepikabhavnani commented Sep 14, 2017 •

edited

Loading

deepikabhavnani commented Oct 17, 2017 •

edited

Loading