-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3k
GCC - Add support to split heap across 2-RAM banks #9944
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
7c07141
Expand sbrk to allocate memory from two regions
719d0fb
Update linker script for split heap support
3593444
Add support of heap memory split between 2-RAM banks.
1a52587
Update the linker file to support single and multiple heap banks
1576fb0
Add support for split heap in ST devices
56154c0
Update the test case to check multiple bank heap regions
20a341d
Add more information and comments
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
what does once do - either changing the name to be more clear about the intention or adding a comment. Or at least 1258 comment could include this boolean - it touches only address check
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
once - is indicator of allowing to enter just once. I can update the comment to add more clarity
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What I meant by sbrk behavior is that if you try to allocate here more memory than is available in first region, the code moves to another region and you end up nothing being allocated from first region in the worst case. And you can't come back here either.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actually, given the current behaviour of newlib's malloc, I don't think the
once
flag is needed.The regions must be in memory address order, or newlib malloc would get confused. (Is that known/documented for this feature? I spotted it by inspection of newlib source, and it makes sense given the normal POSIX function of
sbrk
).So the test could be
if (heap <= (uint32_t) &__mbed_krbs_start_0 && new_heap > (uint32_t) &_mbed_krbs_start_0)
.