Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Drop support for .NET 4.5.2 #24

Open
asosMikeGore opened this issue Oct 26, 2017 · 3 comments
Open

Drop support for .NET 4.5.2 #24

asosMikeGore opened this issue Oct 26, 2017 · 3 comments
Labels

Comments

@asosMikeGore
Copy link

If we dropped support for .NET 4.5.2 (now 3 years old) we can get faster feedback, compile times etc. The only issue is that servers would need to be upgraded to .NET 4.6.1.

Would be great to get some feedback and we can drop this into a major change along with new features.

@DaveAurionix
Copy link

.NET 4.6.1 is fine for us (or .NET 4.7).

@DaveAurionix
Copy link

@asosMikeGore do we still need support for anything other than .NET Standard 1.6?

Quite a few things are going to be faster, simpler or both if we can just target .NET Standard.

If we time-boxed feedback on this issue to two weeks from now and then, in the absence of major objections, dropped explicit targeting for the classic .NET Framework and only supported .NET Standard 1.6 would that be a positive step and help keep this project simple?

@asosMikeGore
Copy link
Author

Had confirmation recently that our internal clients don't mind us dropping .NET Framework support. I've actually been chipping away (slowly) at this on the branch here:
https://github.com/ASOS/SimpleEventStore/tree/containerBuildV2

We recently had a few PRs to address issues on Linux so I'm migrating the build process to run under Linux containers & dropping Cake. There's a few minor bits of tidy up I want to do and then I'll get this integrated with the CI/CD server.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants