Rollkit

[Kayanski]

This PR aims at integrating rollkit inside cw-orch.

For this integration, I used :

• https://rollkit.dev/tutorials/cosmwasm
• celestia/v0.15.0.beta.1 for the Mocha testnet node
• wasmd/v0.50.0 for the node (which opens up port 9290 locally)

I modified :

• In init.sh script, I replaced all occurences of stake by uwasm to be able to pay for gas with the created mnemonic/address
• I used the generated genesis mnemonic of wasmd as LOCAL_MNEMONIC

[cloudflare-workers-and-pages]

Deploying cw-orchestrator with    Cloudflare Pages

Latest commit:	f9563db
Status:	✅  Deploy successful!
Preview URL:	https://fa38e850.cw-orchestrator.pages.dev
Branch Preview URL:	https://rollkit.cw-orchestrator.pages.dev

View logs

[CyberHoward]

I modified :

• In init.sh script, I replaced all occurences of stake by uwasm to be able to pay for gas with the created mnemonic/address
• I used the generated genesis mnemonic of wasmd as LOCAL_MNEMONIC
  Were these modifications upstreamed?

[Kayanski]

I modified :

• In init.sh script, I replaced all occurences of stake by uwasm to be able to pay for gas with the created mnemonic/address
• I used the generated genesis mnemonic of wasmd as LOCAL_MNEMONIC
  Were these modifications upstreamed?

Not sure what you're saying here. The init.sh oart yes, the local mnemonic part is something the user should do

[CyberHoward]

Then that should prefably be documented as well in the doc that you added (how to get the local mnemonic if following the tutorial)

[adairrr]

Is ROLLKIT_1 going to be the best name for this network configuration given that it's always run locally?

Should we include details on connecting to a hosted rollup?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 64.7%. Comparing base (b8ceade) to head (f9563db).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

Files	Coverage Δ
packages/cw-orch-networks/src/networks/mod.rs	0.0% <ø> (ø)

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

[CyberHoward]

Is ROLLKIT_1 going to be the best name for this network configuration given that it's always run locally?

Should we include details on connecting to a hosted rollup?

Our documentation should follow their documentation imo. Otherwise we need to document too much overlapping stuff and if they are not following the rollkit docs then they probably know what they are doing and they can figure out stuff themselves, like a hosted rollup.