-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 48
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Links within slide content #36
Comments
Hi @mattpaz! Slide navigation (like slide dots and prev/next buttons) are generally expected by users to work independently from whatever content is found in the individual slides. The reasoning for why direct keyboard navigation (using the If I'm misinterpreting your question, please let me know! |
WCAG 2.4.3, and maybe WCAG 1.3.2 too, talks about how the tab sequence of content, and content in general, on a page should be "logical", but is a bit fuzzy about what that exactly means. Most of the time, content should be navigable from left-to-right, top-to-bottom, the way you'd read content visually on a page. You might be able to argue that other sequences are "logical" in different situations, but if you stick to the natural reading order you're pretty much never wrong. In this use case the natural reading order, and therefore the most logical tab sequence (IMHO) could either be:
But if other slides contain a focusable element that is visually placed to the right of the slide dots, that second option above probably wouldn't make sense anymore. So I would say that the first option is the smartest in general when you can't predict the inner content of each slide, which is why that is the default tab sequence for accessible-slick! Finally, keyboard and screen reader users expect that the structure of content on a page doesn't change much, if at all, as they are interact with it. If the slide content can be found between the Previous and Next buttons the first time they skim the page, then they would expect to be able to find other slide content there to whenever they use a control to change the active slide. Hope that helps! |
Well, I guess that's food for thought, but still uncertain about what should be expected. I'll go ahead and close this for now, but will circle back and add additional findings should any eureka moments emerge. Thanks for responding. |
Sorry about that! Keyboard and screen reader users would expect to navigate the content from left-to-right, top-to-bottom as it is shown visually. Then when you activate any of the controls, they would then expect to navigate back to the slide content on their own. The sequence of the content should stay the same, and the user would expect to be able to navigate through it on their own. |
Ah, 10-4. Sounds like I shouldn't expect the user to want to navigate to the link inside the slide by tabbing to it. Thanks for clarifying that. |
If a slide contains a link, should it be navigable by keyboard?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: