How to use CEBRA for epoched data? #49
-
Thanks again for being so responsive in the discussion here! We are wondering how you would recommend using CEBRA for epoched or trial-wise data. The paper Figure 3 is based on trial specific data, and it seems that the trials were concatenated s.t. There are a couple of options to deal with epochs. First, they can be concatenated, but this would mean that behaviorally distant samples are fed in the same "sample" to the network, the receptive field would include overlapping information from two epochs. This might be problematic if epochs are short and the receptive fields need to be large. Next, the model could be fitted multiple times with the So I am wondering how you would train the model with this kind of data? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 1 comment 3 replies
-
No problem! Indeed in our first paper we used more or less continuous data (and in Fig. 3 that was how the others in benchmarks used it). If you don't have access to continuous data then concatenating might not be ideal (as you would sample over junctions that likely don't make sense). So, two options: (1) use trial ID as a auxiliary variable, or (2) wait until we release a new update with this (which is already in the works 🤗), but I don't have a firm date on this update yet. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
No problem! Indeed in our first paper we used more or less continuous data (and in Fig. 3 that was how the others in benchmarks used it). If you don't have access to continuous data then concatenating might not be ideal (as you would sample over junctions that likely don't make sense). So, two options: (1) use trial ID as a auxiliary variable, or (2) wait until we release a new update with this (which is already in the works 🤗), but I don't have a firm date on this update yet.