We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
example.org#?#body > div[class="":has(h1)
example.org#%#alert(1);
I think that JS rules should still work.
JS rules don't work.
The real case is here - AdguardTeam/AdguardFilters#41420 It seems that this rule:
cosmopolitan.lt,moteris.lt,panele.lt,manonamai.lt,tavovaikas.lt,delfi.lt#?#a[href="javascript:void(-1);":-abp-has(a[title="[x] Uždaryti"])
from EasyList Lithuania is inccorect and causes that JS rules don't work.
EasyList Lithuania
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
css rules validation was improved in core/pull-requests/1860
Sorry, something went wrong.
It seems that some rules still cause that problem. I'm not sure if I should open new issue in this repo or maybe create issue in ExtendedCSS repo - https://github.com/AdguardTeam/ExtendedCss/issues, so I'm writing comment here.
example.org#?#body:has(div), example.org#%#alert(1);
JS rules should still work.
sxgunchenko
No branches or pull requests
Steps to reproduce
example.org#?#body > div[class="":has(h1)
example.org#%#alert(1);
Expected behavior
I think that JS rules should still work.
Actual behavior
JS rules don't work.
The real case is here - AdguardTeam/AdguardFilters#41420
It seems that this rule:
from
EasyList Lithuania
is inccorect and causes that JS rules don't work.Screenshot:
Your environment
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: