Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Run make to fix code style #288

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 7, 2024

Conversation

oshoma
Copy link
Collaborator

@oshoma oshoma commented Feb 7, 2024

Your checklist for this pull request

Thank you for submitting a pull request! To speed up the review process, please follow this checklist:

  • My Pull Request is small and focused on one topic so it can be reviewed easily
  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project (make format)
  • Commit messages are detailed
  • I have performed a self-review of my code
  • I commented hard-to-understand parts of my code
  • I updated the documentation (docstrings, /docs)
  • My changes generate no new warnings (or explain any new warnings and why they're ok)
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • All tests pass when I run pytest tests (offline mode)

Additional steps for code with networking dependencies:

Description

Run make to fix code style

💔Thank you!

@oshoma oshoma requested a review from 20001LastOrder February 7, 2024 16:31
Copy link
Collaborator

@20001LastOrder 20001LastOrder left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. We should integrate this into the automated build once we figure out the github action

@20001LastOrder 20001LastOrder merged commit 2ae9578 into Aggregate-Intellect:main Feb 7, 2024
@oshoma oshoma deleted the run-make branch February 7, 2024 19:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants